From: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 8/8] x86/mm/tlb: Remove unnecessary uses of the inline keyword
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 14:16:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210209221653.614098-9-namit@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210209221653.614098-1-namit@vmware.com>
From: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
The compiler is smart enough without these hints.
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
---
arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 98d212518f67..4cc28c624d1f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
-static inline unsigned long mm_mangle_tif_spec_ib(struct task_struct *next)
+static unsigned long mm_mangle_tif_spec_ib(struct task_struct *next)
{
unsigned long next_tif = task_thread_info(next)->flags;
unsigned long ibpb = (next_tif >> TIF_SPEC_IB) & LAST_USER_MM_IBPB;
@@ -882,7 +882,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct flush_tlb_info, flush_tlb_info);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, flush_tlb_info_idx);
#endif
-static inline struct flush_tlb_info *get_flush_tlb_info(struct mm_struct *mm,
+static struct flush_tlb_info *get_flush_tlb_info(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
unsigned int stride_shift, bool freed_tables,
u64 new_tlb_gen)
@@ -909,7 +909,7 @@ static inline struct flush_tlb_info *get_flush_tlb_info(struct mm_struct *mm,
return info;
}
-static inline void put_flush_tlb_info(void)
+static void put_flush_tlb_info(void)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
/* Complete reentrency prevention checks */
--
2.25.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-10 1:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-09 22:16 [PATCH v5 0/8] x86/tlb: Concurrent TLB flushes Nadav Amit
2021-02-09 22:16 ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-09 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] smp: Run functions concurrently in smp_call_function_many_cond() Nadav Amit
2021-02-16 12:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-16 18:49 ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-16 12:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-16 16:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-16 18:53 ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-16 18:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-16 19:04 ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-17 1:02 ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-18 12:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-18 8:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-18 9:36 ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-18 11:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-09 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] x86/mm/tlb: Unify flush_tlb_func_local() and flush_tlb_func_remote() Nadav Amit
2021-02-09 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] x86/mm/tlb: Open-code on_each_cpu_cond_mask() for tlb_is_not_lazy() Nadav Amit
2021-02-18 8:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-18 8:24 ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-18 8:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-09 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] x86/mm/tlb: Flush remote and local TLBs concurrently Nadav Amit
2021-02-09 22:16 ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-16 12:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-16 12:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-16 19:17 ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-16 19:17 ` Nadav Amit
2021-02-18 8:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-18 8:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-09 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] x86/mm/tlb: Privatize cpu_tlbstate Nadav Amit
2021-02-09 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] x86/mm/tlb: Do not make is_lazy dirty for no reason Nadav Amit
2021-02-09 22:16 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] cpumask: Mark functions as pure Nadav Amit
2021-02-16 12:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-09 22:16 ` Nadav Amit [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210209221653.614098-9-namit@vmware.com \
--to=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.