All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	dust.li@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH netdev] virtio-net: support XDP_TX when not more queues
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:40:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210210163945-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81abae33fc8dbec37ef0061ff6f6fd696b484a3e.1610523188.git.xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 04:08:57PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> The number of queues implemented by many virtio backends is limited,
> especially some machines have a large number of CPUs. In this case, it
> is often impossible to allocate a separate queue for XDP_TX.
> 
> This patch allows XDP_TX to run by reuse the existing SQ with
> __netif_tx_lock() hold when there are not enough queues.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>

I'd like to get some advice on whether this is ok from some
XDP experts - previously my understanding was that it is
preferable to disable XDP for such devices than
use locks on XDP fast path.

> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index ba8e637..7a3b2a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -195,6 +195,9 @@ struct virtnet_info {
>  	/* # of XDP queue pairs currently used by the driver */
>  	u16 xdp_queue_pairs;
>  
> +	/* xdp_queue_pairs may be 0, when xdp is already loaded. So add this. */
> +	bool xdp_enabled;
> +
>  	/* I like... big packets and I cannot lie! */
>  	bool big_packets;
>  
> @@ -481,14 +484,34 @@ static int __virtnet_xdp_xmit_one(struct virtnet_info *vi,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static struct send_queue *virtnet_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> +static struct send_queue *virtnet_get_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>  {
>  	unsigned int qp;
> +	struct netdev_queue *txq;
> +
> +	if (vi->curr_queue_pairs > nr_cpu_ids) {
> +		qp = vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs + smp_processor_id();
> +	} else {
> +		qp = smp_processor_id() % vi->curr_queue_pairs;
> +		txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, qp);
> +		__netif_tx_lock(txq, raw_smp_processor_id());
> +	}
>  
> -	qp = vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs + smp_processor_id();
>  	return &vi->sq[qp];
>  }
>  
> +static void virtnet_put_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> +{
> +	unsigned int qp;
> +	struct netdev_queue *txq;
> +
> +	if (vi->curr_queue_pairs <= nr_cpu_ids) {
> +		qp = smp_processor_id() % vi->curr_queue_pairs;
> +		txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, qp);
> +		__netif_tx_unlock(txq);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static int virtnet_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev,
>  			    int n, struct xdp_frame **frames, u32 flags)
>  {
> @@ -512,7 +535,7 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev,
>  	if (!xdp_prog)
>  		return -ENXIO;
>  
> -	sq = virtnet_xdp_sq(vi);
> +	sq = virtnet_get_xdp_sq(vi);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(flags & ~XDP_XMIT_FLAGS_MASK)) {
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
> @@ -560,12 +583,13 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev,
>  	sq->stats.kicks += kicks;
>  	u64_stats_update_end(&sq->stats.syncp);
>  
> +	virtnet_put_xdp_sq(vi);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static unsigned int virtnet_get_headroom(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>  {
> -	return vi->xdp_queue_pairs ? VIRTIO_XDP_HEADROOM : 0;
> +	return vi->xdp_enabled ? VIRTIO_XDP_HEADROOM : 0;
>  }
>  
>  /* We copy the packet for XDP in the following cases:
> @@ -1457,12 +1481,13 @@ static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
>  		xdp_do_flush();
>  
>  	if (xdp_xmit & VIRTIO_XDP_TX) {
> -		sq = virtnet_xdp_sq(vi);
> +		sq = virtnet_get_xdp_sq(vi);
>  		if (virtqueue_kick_prepare(sq->vq) && virtqueue_notify(sq->vq)) {
>  			u64_stats_update_begin(&sq->stats.syncp);
>  			sq->stats.kicks++;
>  			u64_stats_update_end(&sq->stats.syncp);
>  		}
> +		virtnet_put_xdp_sq(vi);
>  	}
>  
>  	return received;
> @@ -2416,12 +2441,8 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,
>  		xdp_qp = nr_cpu_ids;
>  
>  	/* XDP requires extra queues for XDP_TX */
> -	if (curr_qp + xdp_qp > vi->max_queue_pairs) {
> -		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Too few free TX rings available");
> -		netdev_warn(dev, "request %i queues but max is %i\n",
> -			    curr_qp + xdp_qp, vi->max_queue_pairs);
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -	}
> +	if (curr_qp + xdp_qp > vi->max_queue_pairs)
> +		xdp_qp = 0;
>  
>  	old_prog = rtnl_dereference(vi->rq[0].xdp_prog);
>  	if (!prog && !old_prog)
> @@ -2453,12 +2474,14 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,
>  	netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(dev, curr_qp + xdp_qp);
>  	vi->xdp_queue_pairs = xdp_qp;
>  
> +	vi->xdp_enabled = false;
>  	if (prog) {
>  		for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>  			rcu_assign_pointer(vi->rq[i].xdp_prog, prog);
>  			if (i == 0 && !old_prog)
>  				virtnet_clear_guest_offloads(vi);
>  		}
> +		vi->xdp_enabled = true;
>  	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> @@ -2526,7 +2549,7 @@ static int virtnet_set_features(struct net_device *dev,
>  	int err;
>  
>  	if ((dev->features ^ features) & NETIF_F_LRO) {
> -		if (vi->xdp_queue_pairs)
> +		if (vi->xdp_enabled)
>  			return -EBUSY;
>  
>  		if (features & NETIF_F_LRO)
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	dust.li@linux.alibaba.com, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH netdev] virtio-net: support XDP_TX when not more queues
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:40:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210210163945-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81abae33fc8dbec37ef0061ff6f6fd696b484a3e.1610523188.git.xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 04:08:57PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> The number of queues implemented by many virtio backends is limited,
> especially some machines have a large number of CPUs. In this case, it
> is often impossible to allocate a separate queue for XDP_TX.
> 
> This patch allows XDP_TX to run by reuse the existing SQ with
> __netif_tx_lock() hold when there are not enough queues.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>

I'd like to get some advice on whether this is ok from some
XDP experts - previously my understanding was that it is
preferable to disable XDP for such devices than
use locks on XDP fast path.

> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index ba8e637..7a3b2a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -195,6 +195,9 @@ struct virtnet_info {
>  	/* # of XDP queue pairs currently used by the driver */
>  	u16 xdp_queue_pairs;
>  
> +	/* xdp_queue_pairs may be 0, when xdp is already loaded. So add this. */
> +	bool xdp_enabled;
> +
>  	/* I like... big packets and I cannot lie! */
>  	bool big_packets;
>  
> @@ -481,14 +484,34 @@ static int __virtnet_xdp_xmit_one(struct virtnet_info *vi,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static struct send_queue *virtnet_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> +static struct send_queue *virtnet_get_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>  {
>  	unsigned int qp;
> +	struct netdev_queue *txq;
> +
> +	if (vi->curr_queue_pairs > nr_cpu_ids) {
> +		qp = vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs + smp_processor_id();
> +	} else {
> +		qp = smp_processor_id() % vi->curr_queue_pairs;
> +		txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, qp);
> +		__netif_tx_lock(txq, raw_smp_processor_id());
> +	}
>  
> -	qp = vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs + smp_processor_id();
>  	return &vi->sq[qp];
>  }
>  
> +static void virtnet_put_xdp_sq(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> +{
> +	unsigned int qp;
> +	struct netdev_queue *txq;
> +
> +	if (vi->curr_queue_pairs <= nr_cpu_ids) {
> +		qp = smp_processor_id() % vi->curr_queue_pairs;
> +		txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, qp);
> +		__netif_tx_unlock(txq);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static int virtnet_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev,
>  			    int n, struct xdp_frame **frames, u32 flags)
>  {
> @@ -512,7 +535,7 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev,
>  	if (!xdp_prog)
>  		return -ENXIO;
>  
> -	sq = virtnet_xdp_sq(vi);
> +	sq = virtnet_get_xdp_sq(vi);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(flags & ~XDP_XMIT_FLAGS_MASK)) {
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
> @@ -560,12 +583,13 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev,
>  	sq->stats.kicks += kicks;
>  	u64_stats_update_end(&sq->stats.syncp);
>  
> +	virtnet_put_xdp_sq(vi);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static unsigned int virtnet_get_headroom(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>  {
> -	return vi->xdp_queue_pairs ? VIRTIO_XDP_HEADROOM : 0;
> +	return vi->xdp_enabled ? VIRTIO_XDP_HEADROOM : 0;
>  }
>  
>  /* We copy the packet for XDP in the following cases:
> @@ -1457,12 +1481,13 @@ static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
>  		xdp_do_flush();
>  
>  	if (xdp_xmit & VIRTIO_XDP_TX) {
> -		sq = virtnet_xdp_sq(vi);
> +		sq = virtnet_get_xdp_sq(vi);
>  		if (virtqueue_kick_prepare(sq->vq) && virtqueue_notify(sq->vq)) {
>  			u64_stats_update_begin(&sq->stats.syncp);
>  			sq->stats.kicks++;
>  			u64_stats_update_end(&sq->stats.syncp);
>  		}
> +		virtnet_put_xdp_sq(vi);
>  	}
>  
>  	return received;
> @@ -2416,12 +2441,8 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,
>  		xdp_qp = nr_cpu_ids;
>  
>  	/* XDP requires extra queues for XDP_TX */
> -	if (curr_qp + xdp_qp > vi->max_queue_pairs) {
> -		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Too few free TX rings available");
> -		netdev_warn(dev, "request %i queues but max is %i\n",
> -			    curr_qp + xdp_qp, vi->max_queue_pairs);
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -	}
> +	if (curr_qp + xdp_qp > vi->max_queue_pairs)
> +		xdp_qp = 0;
>  
>  	old_prog = rtnl_dereference(vi->rq[0].xdp_prog);
>  	if (!prog && !old_prog)
> @@ -2453,12 +2474,14 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,
>  	netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(dev, curr_qp + xdp_qp);
>  	vi->xdp_queue_pairs = xdp_qp;
>  
> +	vi->xdp_enabled = false;
>  	if (prog) {
>  		for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>  			rcu_assign_pointer(vi->rq[i].xdp_prog, prog);
>  			if (i == 0 && !old_prog)
>  				virtnet_clear_guest_offloads(vi);
>  		}
> +		vi->xdp_enabled = true;
>  	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> @@ -2526,7 +2549,7 @@ static int virtnet_set_features(struct net_device *dev,
>  	int err;
>  
>  	if ((dev->features ^ features) & NETIF_F_LRO) {
> -		if (vi->xdp_queue_pairs)
> +		if (vi->xdp_enabled)
>  			return -EBUSY;
>  
>  		if (features & NETIF_F_LRO)
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-10 21:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-13  8:08 [PATCH netdev] virtio-net: support XDP_TX when not more queues Xuan Zhuo
2021-01-16  1:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-02-10 21:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2021-02-10 21:40   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-11 11:00   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-02-11 11:00     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-02-18  2:18   ` Jason Wang
2021-02-18  2:18     ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210210163945-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.