From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 02/12] tracepoints: Remove unnecessary "data_args" macro parameter
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 21:09:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210211020948.718057244@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20210211020927.829775774@goodmis.org
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
While working on a clean up that would restructure the difference between
architectures that have static calls vs those that do not, I was stumbling
over the "data_args" parameter that includes "__data" in the arguments. The
issue was that one version didn't even need it, while the other one did.
Instead of injecting a "__data = NULL;" into the macro for the unneeded
version, just remove it completely.
The original idea behind data_args is that there may be a case of a
tracepoint with no arguments. But this is considered bad practice, and all
tracepoints should pass something to that location (that's what tracepoints
were created for).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210208201050.768074128@goodmis.org
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
include/linux/tracepoint.h | 31 +++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
index 966ed8980327..42bb5b753b33 100644
--- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
+++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
@@ -160,13 +160,8 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
/*
* it_func[0] is never NULL because there is at least one element in the array
* when the array itself is non NULL.
- *
- * Note, the proto and args passed in includes "__data" as the first parameter.
- * The reason for this is to handle the "void" prototype. If a tracepoint
- * has a "void" prototype, then it is invalid to declare a function
- * as "(void *, void)".
*/
-#define __DO_TRACE(name, proto, args, cond, rcuidle) \
+#define __DO_TRACE(name, args, cond, rcuidle) \
do { \
struct tracepoint_func *it_func_ptr; \
int __maybe_unused __idx = 0; \
@@ -194,7 +189,7 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
rcu_dereference_raw((&__tracepoint_##name)->funcs); \
if (it_func_ptr) { \
__data = (it_func_ptr)->data; \
- __DO_TRACE_CALL(name)(args); \
+ __DO_TRACE_CALL(name)(__data, args); \
} \
\
if (rcuidle) { \
@@ -206,17 +201,16 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
} while (0)
#ifndef MODULE
-#define __DECLARE_TRACE_RCU(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto, data_args) \
+#define __DECLARE_TRACE_RCU(name, proto, args, cond) \
static inline void trace_##name##_rcuidle(proto) \
{ \
if (static_key_false(&__tracepoint_##name.key)) \
__DO_TRACE(name, \
- TP_PROTO(data_proto), \
- TP_ARGS(data_args), \
+ TP_ARGS(args), \
TP_CONDITION(cond), 1); \
}
#else
-#define __DECLARE_TRACE_RCU(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto, data_args)
+#define __DECLARE_TRACE_RCU(name, proto, args, cond)
#endif
/*
@@ -231,7 +225,7 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
* even when this tracepoint is off. This code has no purpose other than
* poking RCU a bit.
*/
-#define __DECLARE_TRACE(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto, data_args) \
+#define __DECLARE_TRACE(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto) \
extern int __traceiter_##name(data_proto); \
DECLARE_STATIC_CALL(tp_func_##name, __traceiter_##name); \
extern struct tracepoint __tracepoint_##name; \
@@ -239,8 +233,7 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
{ \
if (static_key_false(&__tracepoint_##name.key)) \
__DO_TRACE(name, \
- TP_PROTO(data_proto), \
- TP_ARGS(data_args), \
+ TP_ARGS(args), \
TP_CONDITION(cond), 0); \
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) && (cond)) { \
rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(); \
@@ -249,7 +242,7 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
} \
} \
__DECLARE_TRACE_RCU(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), \
- PARAMS(cond), PARAMS(data_proto), PARAMS(data_args)) \
+ PARAMS(cond)) \
static inline int \
register_trace_##name(void (*probe)(data_proto), void *data) \
{ \
@@ -332,7 +325,7 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
#else /* !TRACEPOINTS_ENABLED */
-#define __DECLARE_TRACE(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto, data_args) \
+#define __DECLARE_TRACE(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto) \
static inline void trace_##name(proto) \
{ } \
static inline void trace_##name##_rcuidle(proto) \
@@ -412,14 +405,12 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
#define DECLARE_TRACE(name, proto, args) \
__DECLARE_TRACE(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), \
cpu_online(raw_smp_processor_id()), \
- PARAMS(void *__data, proto), \
- PARAMS(__data, args))
+ PARAMS(void *__data, proto))
#define DECLARE_TRACE_CONDITION(name, proto, args, cond) \
__DECLARE_TRACE(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), \
cpu_online(raw_smp_processor_id()) && (PARAMS(cond)), \
- PARAMS(void *__data, proto), \
- PARAMS(__data, args))
+ PARAMS(void *__data, proto))
#define TRACE_EVENT_FLAGS(event, flag)
--
2.29.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-11 2:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-11 2:09 [for-next][PATCH 00/12] tracing: Updates for 5.12 Steven Rostedt
2021-02-11 2:09 ` [for-next][PATCH 01/12] tracing: Do not create "enable" or "filter" files for ftrace event subsystem Steven Rostedt
2021-02-11 2:09 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2021-02-11 2:09 ` [for-next][PATCH 03/12] tracepoints: Do not punish non static call users Steven Rostedt
2021-02-11 2:09 ` [for-next][PATCH 04/12] tracepoints: Code clean up Steven Rostedt
2021-02-11 2:09 ` [for-next][PATCH 05/12] ftrace: Remove unused ftrace_force_update() Steven Rostedt
2021-02-11 2:09 ` [for-next][PATCH 06/12] kprobes: Warn if the kprobe is reregistered Steven Rostedt
2021-02-11 2:09 ` [for-next][PATCH 07/12] tracing/dynevent: Delegate parsing to create function Steven Rostedt
2021-02-11 2:09 ` [for-next][PATCH 08/12] tracing: Rework synthetic event command parsing Steven Rostedt
2021-02-11 2:09 ` [for-next][PATCH 09/12] tracing: Update synth command errors Steven Rostedt
2021-02-11 2:09 ` [for-next][PATCH 10/12] tracing: Add a backward-compatibility check for synthetic event creation Steven Rostedt
2021-02-11 2:09 ` [for-next][PATCH 11/12] selftests/ftrace: Update synthetic event syntax errors Steven Rostedt
2021-02-11 2:09 ` [for-next][PATCH 12/12] selftests/ftrace: Add !event synthetic event syntax check Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210211020948.718057244@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.