From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84FAAC433DB for ; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 13:51:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27ACB64DD9 for ; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 13:51:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 27ACB64DD9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=invisiblethingslab.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.84597.158668 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lAvKC-0004FO-6X; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 13:51:04 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 84597.158668; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 13:51:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lAvKC-0004FH-36; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 13:51:04 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 84597; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 13:51:03 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lAvKA-0004FC-Q6 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 13:51:03 +0000 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (unknown [66.111.4.27]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 3277022c-ac15-4d4f-8869-88b01d3b5c9c; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 13:51:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4A65C00CE; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 08:51:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 13 Feb 2021 08:51:01 -0500 Received: from mail-itl (ip5b434f04.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [91.67.79.4]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DCC11240057; Sat, 13 Feb 2021 08:50:59 -0500 (EST) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 3277022c-ac15-4d4f-8869-88b01d3b5c9c DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=OmsRd5 fT8lTKWh0LAKPh0yMk5Y9O+be3M4lCrp7Ghx4=; b=HRdQxaFnWYnGqFNihk5cxD ORl+1Rct0JkXz53veGmMAvNElsUv3E1GNIelFfEgbfUNXhS53BcMXIpCYq+TZfU5 3C5bpKwyxlGkfZaFxjPB8oHGE/cOnyz/nta6hotPQjiVzX8bb0xL9fxCM9QcbGSX 06SZ/wexXWLW+HnCGj76Vm/X8qi7MRV8qkzmekBH4DQ9QYvQ7HsDhNK1C2Sdq/zI geP3wPsz92wgxqsYjVJmlpV80ybECsX2i2DWriqOeHQlZrec4sbbbmYxf5fuRwCP 8dzqLGNMGWtgIPzMTSJNzU2Xadp4OVFlPewODOMMIOFY1IYy52kP3XhcIdU14wdQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrieefgdehvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddtjeenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhgvkhcu ofgrrhgtiiihkhhofihskhhiqdfikphrvggtkhhiuceomhgrrhhmrghrvghksehinhhvih hsihgslhgvthhhihhnghhslhgrsgdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepteevffei gffhkefhgfegfeffhfegveeikeettdfhheevieehieeitddugeefteffnecukfhppeelud drieejrdejledrgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhl fhhrohhmpehmrghrmhgrrhgvkhesihhnvhhishhisghlvghthhhinhhgshhlrggsrdgtoh hm X-ME-Proxy: Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 14:50:56 +0100 From: Marek =?utf-8?Q?Marczykowski-G=C3=B3recki?= To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, cardoe@cardoe.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, wl@xen.org, iwj@xenproject.org, anthony.perard@citrix.com, Stefano Stabellini Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: don't build hvmloader if it is not needed Message-ID: <20210213135056.GA6191@mail-itl> References: <20210213020540.27894-1-sstabellini@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210213020540.27894-1-sstabellini@kernel.org> --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; protected-headers=v1; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: don't build hvmloader if it is not needed On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 06:05:40PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > If rombios, seabios and ovmf are all disabled, don't attempt to build > hvmloader. What if you choose to not build any of rombios, seabios, ovmf, but use system one instead? Wouldn't that exclude hvmloader too? This heuristic seems like a bit too much, maybe instead add an explicit option to skip hvmloader? --=20 Best Regards, Marek Marczykowski-G=C3=B3recki Invisible Things Lab --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEhrpukzGPukRmQqkK24/THMrX1ywFAmAn2UAACgkQ24/THMrX 1yzU9Af9Gmygp9ELtsgMuobBJp2H6cb6ILXlKKt9l2CK3zNDXntu7nNggntcn/us O1/1iUCrH3rv0tqf9PxAKTLizKiWK1n7jMQWmhEazTOSKz1z1cgS4LhfTfCxS5gz nuE6VNrpLqTyEcDl7/k98NW+5UvFVfcTxvL/wlzpAHVR6R4NtQQGS9DFXRUr2sxI 93HfkERFeMLpDnMKflAHUhi7P1ZFcmL4rr6LqoDsBYUhA36uQWZuMwhesl536pl7 djrMvLcAXMGUh9pbiQzv0z0ksVmsOltPZekG8gHDg7FbJAeYMRY0Oe6nBHNUAxxK 00OnttGWp1F999V91M94j56ImetkGA== =rKuN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7--