All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Andrea Arcangeli" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	"Baoquan He" <bhe@redhat.com>, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Łukasz Majczak" <lma@semihalf.com>,
	"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, "Qian Cai" <cai@lca.pw>,
	"Sarvela, Tomi P" <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] mm: refactor initialization of struct page for holes in memory layout
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 23:24:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210215212440.GA1307762@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YCo4Lyio1h2Heixh@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:00:31AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sun 14-02-21 20:00:16, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 02:18:20PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> 
> > We can correctly set the zone links for the reserved pages for holes in the
> > middle of a zone based on the architecture constraints and with only the
> > holes in the beginning/end of the memory will be not spanned by any
> > node/zone which in practice does not seem to be a problem as the VM_BUG_ON
> > in set_pfnblock_flags_mask() never triggered on pfn 0.
> 
> I really fail to see what you mean by correct zone/node for a memory
> range which is not associated with any real node.

We know architectural zone constraints, so we can have always have 1:1
match from pfn to zone. Node indeed will be a guess.
  
> > > I am sorry, I haven't followed previous discussions. Has the removal of
> > > the VM_BUG_ON been considered as an immediate workaround?
> > 
> > It was never discussed, but I'm not sure it's a good idea.
> > 
> > Judging by the commit message that introduced the VM_BUG_ON (commit
> > 86051ca5eaf5 ("mm: fix usemap initialization")) there was yet another
> > inconsistency in the memory map that required a special care.
> 
> Can we actually explore that path before adding yet additional
> complexity and potentially a very involved fix for a subtle problem?

This patch was intended as a fix for inconsistency of the memory map that
is the root cause for triggering this VM_BUG_ON and other corner case
problems. 

The previous version [1] is less involved as it does not extend node/zone
spans.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210130221035.4169-3-rppt@kernel.org
-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-15 21:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-08 11:08 [PATCH v5 1/1] mm: refactor initialization of struct page for holes in memory layout Mike Rapoport
2021-02-08 21:11 ` Andrew Morton
2021-02-08 21:25   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-12  9:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-12  9:56   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-12 10:11     ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-12 10:16       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-12 10:37         ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-14 17:29     ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-15  8:45       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-16 11:13         ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-12 10:33 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-12 10:42   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-12 13:18     ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-14 18:00       ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-15  9:00         ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-15  9:05           ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-15 21:24           ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2021-02-16  8:33             ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-16 11:01               ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-16 11:39                 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-16 12:34                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-02-16 12:59                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-02-16 13:11                   ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-16 16:39                     ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-02-16 17:49                       ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-17 12:27                         ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210215212440.GA1307762@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lma@semihalf.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.