From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: <cohuck@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <peterx@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/10] vfio/pci: Use vfio_device_unmap_mapping_range()
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:22:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210222172230.GO4247@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <161401267316.16443.11184767955094847849.stgit@gimli.home>
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 09:51:13AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> + vfio_device_unmap_mapping_range(vdev->device,
> + VFIO_PCI_INDEX_TO_OFFSET(VFIO_PCI_BAR0_REGION_INDEX),
> + VFIO_PCI_INDEX_TO_OFFSET(VFIO_PCI_ROM_REGION_INDEX) -
> + VFIO_PCI_INDEX_TO_OFFSET(VFIO_PCI_BAR0_REGION_INDEX));
Isn't this the same as invalidating everything? I see in
vfio_pci_mmap():
if (index >= VFIO_PCI_ROM_REGION_INDEX)
return -EINVAL;
> @@ -2273,15 +2112,13 @@ static int vfio_pci_try_zap_and_vma_lock_cb(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data)
>
> vdev = vfio_device_data(device);
>
> - /*
> - * Locking multiple devices is prone to deadlock, runaway and
> - * unwind if we hit contention.
> - */
> - if (!vfio_pci_zap_and_vma_lock(vdev, true)) {
> + if (!down_write_trylock(&vdev->memory_lock)) {
> vfio_device_put(device);
> return -EBUSY;
> }
And this is only done as part of VFIO_DEVICE_PCI_HOT_RESET?
It looks like VFIO_DEVICE_PCI_HOT_RESET effects the entire slot?
How about putting the inode on the reflck structure, which is also
per-slot, and then a single unmap_mapping_range() will take care of
everything, no need to iterate over things in the driver core.
Note the vm->pg_off space doesn't have any special meaning, it is
fine that two struct vfio_pci_device's are sharing the same address
space and using an incompatible overlapping pg_offs
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h
> index 9cd1882a05af..ba37f4eeefd0 100644
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h
> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ struct vfio_pci_mmap_vma {
>
> struct vfio_pci_device {
> struct pci_dev *pdev;
> + struct vfio_device *device;
Ah, I did this too, but I didn't use a pointer :)
All the places trying to call vfio_device_put() when they really want
a vfio_pci_device * become simpler now. Eg struct vfio_devices wants
to have an array of vfio_pci_device, and get_pf_vdev() only needs to
return one pointer.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-22 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-22 16:50 [RFC PATCH 00/10] vfio: Device memory DMA mapping improvements Alex Williamson
2021-02-22 16:50 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] vfio: Create vfio_fs_type with inode per device Alex Williamson
2021-02-26 5:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-26 13:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-22 16:50 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] vfio: Update vfio_add_group_dev() API Alex Williamson
2021-02-22 17:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-22 16:50 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] vfio: Export unmap_mapping_range() wrapper Alex Williamson
2021-02-22 16:51 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] vfio/pci: Use vfio_device_unmap_mapping_range() Alex Williamson
2021-02-22 17:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-02-24 21:55 ` Alex Williamson
2021-02-25 0:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-22 16:51 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] vfio: Create a vfio_device from vma lookup Alex Williamson
2021-02-22 17:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-24 21:55 ` Alex Williamson
2021-02-25 0:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-25 22:21 ` Alex Williamson
2021-02-25 23:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-04 21:37 ` Alex Williamson
2021-03-04 23:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-05 0:07 ` Alex Williamson
2021-03-05 0:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-22 16:51 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] vfio: Add a device notifier interface Alex Williamson
2021-02-22 16:51 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] vfio/pci: Notify on device release Alex Williamson
2021-02-22 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] vfio/type1: Refactor pfn_list clearing Alex Williamson
2021-02-22 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] vfio/type1: Pass iommu and dma objects through to vaddr_get_pfn Alex Williamson
2021-02-22 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] vfio/type1: Register device notifier Alex Williamson
2021-02-22 17:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-24 21:55 ` Alex Williamson
2021-02-25 0:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-25 17:54 ` Peter Xu
2021-02-25 18:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-25 19:06 ` Peter Xu
2021-02-25 19:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-25 19:54 ` Peter Xu
2021-02-26 5:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-22 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH 00/10] vfio: Device memory DMA mapping improvements Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210222172230.GO4247@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.