All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/11] bpf: refactor check_func_call() to allow callback function
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:33:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210225073312.4120415-1-yhs@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210225073309.4119708-1-yhs@fb.com>

Later proposed bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper has callback
function as one of its arguments. This patch refactored
check_func_call() to permit callback function which sets
callee state. Different callback functions may have
different callee states.

There is no functionality change for this patch except
it added a case to handle where subprog number is known
and there is no need to do find_subprog(). This case
is used later by implementing bpf_for_each_map() helper.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index a657860ecba5..092d2c734dd8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5250,13 +5250,19 @@ static void clear_caller_saved_regs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	}
 }
 
-static int check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
-			   int *insn_idx)
+typedef int (*set_callee_state_fn)(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+				   struct bpf_func_state *caller,
+				   struct bpf_func_state *callee,
+				   int insn_idx);
+
+static int __check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
+			     int *insn_idx, int subprog,
+			     set_callee_state_fn set_callee_st)
 {
 	struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state;
 	struct bpf_func_info_aux *func_info_aux;
 	struct bpf_func_state *caller, *callee;
-	int i, err, subprog, target_insn;
+	int err, target_insn;
 	bool is_global = false;
 
 	if (state->curframe + 1 >= MAX_CALL_FRAMES) {
@@ -5265,12 +5271,16 @@ static int check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 		return -E2BIG;
 	}
 
-	target_insn = *insn_idx + insn->imm;
-	subprog = find_subprog(env, target_insn + 1);
 	if (subprog < 0) {
-		verbose(env, "verifier bug. No program starts at insn %d\n",
-			target_insn + 1);
-		return -EFAULT;
+		target_insn = *insn_idx + insn->imm;
+		subprog = find_subprog(env, target_insn + 1);
+		if (subprog < 0) {
+			verbose(env, "verifier bug. No program starts at insn %d\n",
+				target_insn + 1);
+			return -EFAULT;
+		}
+	} else {
+		target_insn = env->subprog_info[subprog].start - 1;
 	}
 
 	caller = state->frame[state->curframe];
@@ -5327,11 +5337,9 @@ static int check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	/* copy r1 - r5 args that callee can access.  The copy includes parent
-	 * pointers, which connects us up to the liveness chain
-	 */
-	for (i = BPF_REG_1; i <= BPF_REG_5; i++)
-		callee->regs[i] = caller->regs[i];
+	err = set_callee_st(env, caller, callee, *insn_idx);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 
 	clear_caller_saved_regs(env, caller->regs);
 
@@ -5350,6 +5358,26 @@ static int check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int set_callee_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
+			    struct bpf_func_state *caller,
+			    struct bpf_func_state *callee, int insn_idx)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	/* copy r1 - r5 args that callee can access.  The copy includes parent
+	 * pointers, which connects us up to the liveness chain
+	 */
+	for (i = BPF_REG_1; i <= BPF_REG_5; i++)
+		callee->regs[i] = caller->regs[i];
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
+			   int *insn_idx)
+{
+	return __check_func_call(env, insn, insn_idx, -1, set_callee_state);
+}
+
 static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx)
 {
 	struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state;
-- 
2.24.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-25  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-25  7:33 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/11] bpf: add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper Yonghong Song
2021-02-25  7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/11] bpf: factor out visit_func_call_insn() in check_cfg() Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 21:54   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-25 22:01     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-02-25  7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/11] bpf: factor out verbose_invalid_scalar() Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 21:56   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-25  7:33 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2021-02-25 22:05   ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/11] bpf: refactor check_func_call() to allow callback function Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-25 22:31     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-26  0:08       ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-26  1:18         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-26  0:05     ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-25  7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/11] bpf: add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 22:41   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-26  2:16     ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-26  3:22       ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-26  2:27   ` Cong Wang
2021-02-26  3:27     ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-25  7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/11] bpf: add hashtab support for " Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 22:44   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-25  7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/11] bpf: add arraymap " Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 22:48   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-25  7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/11] libbpf: move function is_ldimm64() earlier in libbpf.c Yonghong Song
2021-02-25  7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/11] libbpf: support subprog address relocation Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 23:04   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-25  7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/11] bpftool: print subprog address properly Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 23:04   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-25  7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/11] selftests/bpf: add hashmap test for bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 23:25   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-26  3:24     ` Yonghong Song
2021-02-25  7:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/11] selftests/bpf: add arraymap " Yonghong Song
2021-02-25 23:26   ` Andrii Nakryiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210225073312.4120415-1-yhs@fb.com \
    --to=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.