All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: Simplify leaf_cfs_rq_list maintenance
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 01:44:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202102260106.eTExtjQH-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210225162757.48858-1-mkoutny@suse.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8905 bytes --]

Hi "Michal,

[FYI, it's a private test report for your RFC patch.]
[auto build test ERROR on tip/sched/core]
[also build test ERROR on v5.11 next-20210225]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Michal-Koutn/sched-Simplify-leaf_cfs_rq_list-maintenance/20210226-003049
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git c5e6fc08feb2b88dc5dac2f3c817e1c2a4cafda4
config: sparc64-randconfig-s032-20210225 (attached as .config)
compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce:
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # apt-get install sparse
        # sparse version: v0.6.3-229-g60c1f270-dirty
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/e566cc27ca5c69d5199dd3b9ad07dfc4bdc35eac
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Michal-Koutn/sched-Simplify-leaf_cfs_rq_list-maintenance/20210226-003049
        git checkout e566cc27ca5c69d5199dd3b9ad07dfc4bdc35eac
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' ARCH=sparc64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from arch/sparc/include/asm/bug.h:6,
                    from include/linux/bug.h:5,
                    from include/linux/thread_info.h:12,
                    from arch/sparc/include/asm/current.h:15,
                    from include/linux/sched.h:12,
                    from kernel/sched/sched.h:5,
                    from kernel/sched/fair.c:23:
   kernel/sched/fair.c: In function 'enqueue_entity':
>> kernel/sched/fair.c:4250:34: error: implicit declaration of function 'throttled_hierarchy' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    4250 |  if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1 && !throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
         |                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/compiler.h:58:52: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if_var'
      58 | #define __trace_if_var(cond) (__builtin_constant_p(cond) ? (cond) : __trace_if_value(cond))
         |                                                    ^~~~
   kernel/sched/fair.c:4250:2: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
    4250 |  if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1 && !throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
         |  ^~
   kernel/sched/fair.c: At top level:
>> kernel/sched/fair.c:5361:19: error: static declaration of 'throttled_hierarchy' follows non-static declaration
    5361 | static inline int throttled_hierarchy(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
         |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   In file included from arch/sparc/include/asm/bug.h:6,
                    from include/linux/bug.h:5,
                    from include/linux/thread_info.h:12,
                    from arch/sparc/include/asm/current.h:15,
                    from include/linux/sched.h:12,
                    from kernel/sched/sched.h:5,
                    from kernel/sched/fair.c:23:
   kernel/sched/fair.c:4250:34: note: previous implicit declaration of 'throttled_hierarchy' was here
    4250 |  if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1 && !throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
         |                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/compiler.h:58:52: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if_var'
      58 | #define __trace_if_var(cond) (__builtin_constant_p(cond) ? (cond) : __trace_if_value(cond))
         |                                                    ^~~~
   kernel/sched/fair.c:4250:2: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
    4250 |  if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1 && !throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
         |  ^~
   kernel/sched/fair.c:5372:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'init_cfs_bandwidth' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    5372 | void init_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b) {}
         |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/sched/fair.c:11160:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'free_fair_sched_group' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
   11160 | void free_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg) { }
         |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/sched/fair.c:11162:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'alloc_fair_sched_group' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
   11162 | int alloc_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, struct task_group *parent)
         |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/sched/fair.c:11167:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'online_fair_sched_group' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
   11167 | void online_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg) { }
         |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/sched/fair.c:11169:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'unregister_fair_sched_group' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
   11169 | void unregister_fair_sched_group(struct task_group *tg) { }
         |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

Kconfig warnings: (for reference only)
   WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for FRAME_POINTER
   Depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && (M68K || UML || SUPERH) || ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS || MCOUNT
   Selected by
   - LOCKDEP && DEBUG_KERNEL && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT && !MIPS && !PPC && !ARM && !S390 && !MICROBLAZE && !ARC && !X86


vim +/throttled_hierarchy +4250 kernel/sched/fair.c

  4166	
  4167	/*
  4168	 * MIGRATION
  4169	 *
  4170	 *	dequeue
  4171	 *	  update_curr()
  4172	 *	    update_min_vruntime()
  4173	 *	  vruntime -= min_vruntime
  4174	 *
  4175	 *	enqueue
  4176	 *	  update_curr()
  4177	 *	    update_min_vruntime()
  4178	 *	  vruntime += min_vruntime
  4179	 *
  4180	 * this way the vruntime transition between RQs is done when both
  4181	 * min_vruntime are up-to-date.
  4182	 *
  4183	 * WAKEUP (remote)
  4184	 *
  4185	 *	->migrate_task_rq_fair() (p->state == TASK_WAKING)
  4186	 *	  vruntime -= min_vruntime
  4187	 *
  4188	 *	enqueue
  4189	 *	  update_curr()
  4190	 *	    update_min_vruntime()
  4191	 *	  vruntime += min_vruntime
  4192	 *
  4193	 * this way we don't have the most up-to-date min_vruntime on the originating
  4194	 * CPU and an up-to-date min_vruntime on the destination CPU.
  4195	 */
  4196	
  4197	static void
  4198	enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
  4199	{
  4200		bool renorm = !(flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP) || (flags & ENQUEUE_MIGRATED);
  4201		bool curr = cfs_rq->curr == se;
  4202	
  4203		/*
  4204		 * If we're the current task, we must renormalise before calling
  4205		 * update_curr().
  4206		 */
  4207		if (renorm && curr)
  4208			se->vruntime += cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
  4209	
  4210		update_curr(cfs_rq);
  4211	
  4212		/*
  4213		 * Otherwise, renormalise after, such that we're placed at the current
  4214		 * moment in time, instead of some random moment in the past. Being
  4215		 * placed in the past could significantly boost this task to the
  4216		 * fairness detriment of existing tasks.
  4217		 */
  4218		if (renorm && !curr)
  4219			se->vruntime += cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
  4220	
  4221		/*
  4222		 * When enqueuing a sched_entity, we must:
  4223		 *   - Update loads to have both entity and cfs_rq synced with now.
  4224		 *   - Add its load to cfs_rq->runnable_avg
  4225		 *   - For group_entity, update its weight to reflect the new share of
  4226		 *     its group cfs_rq
  4227		 *   - Add its new weight to cfs_rq->load.weight
  4228		 */
  4229		update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, UPDATE_TG | DO_ATTACH);
  4230		se_update_runnable(se);
  4231		update_cfs_group(se);
  4232		account_entity_enqueue(cfs_rq, se);
  4233	
  4234		if (flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP)
  4235			place_entity(cfs_rq, se, 0);
  4236	
  4237		check_schedstat_required();
  4238		update_stats_enqueue(cfs_rq, se, flags);
  4239		check_spread(cfs_rq, se);
  4240		if (!curr)
  4241			__enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
  4242		se->on_rq = 1;
  4243	
  4244		/*
  4245		 * When bandwidth control is enabled, cfs might have been removed
  4246		 * because of a parent been throttled. We'll add it later (with
  4247		 * complete branch up to se->on_rq/cfs_eq->on_list) in
  4248		 * tg_unthrottle_up() and unthrottle_cfs_rq().
  4249		 */
> 4250		if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1 && !throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
  4251			list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
  4252	
  4253		if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1)
  4254			check_enqueue_throttle(cfs_rq);
  4255	}
  4256	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 23663 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-25 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-25 16:27 [RFC PATCH] sched: Simplify leaf_cfs_rq_list maintenance Michal Koutný
2021-02-25 17:44 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2021-03-08  8:18 ` Dietmar Eggemann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202102260106.eTExtjQH-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.