From: "Minjae Kim" <flowergom@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: Minjae Kim <flowergom@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] python3: fix CVE-2021-3177
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 22:58:26 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210226135826.5811-1-flowergom@gmail.com> (raw)
Replace snprintf with Python unicode formatting in ctypes param reprs
Upstream-Status: Backport [https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/916610ef90a0d0761f08747f7b0905541f0977c7]
CVE: CVE-2021-3177
Signed-off-by: Minjae Kim <flowergom@gmail.com>
---
.../python/python3/CVE-2021-3177.patch | 183 ++++++++++++++++++
meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3_3.8.2.bb | 1 +
2 files changed, 184 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3/CVE-2021-3177.patch
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3/CVE-2021-3177.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3/CVE-2021-3177.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..b2d22a074d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3/CVE-2021-3177.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
+From 916610ef90a0d0761f08747f7b0905541f0977c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@python.org>
+Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:47:05 -0600
+Subject: [PATCH] closes bpo-42938: Replace snprintf with Python unicode
+ formatting in ctypes param reprs. (24239)
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport [https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/916610ef90a0d0761f08747f7b0905541f0977c7]
+CVE: CVE-2021-3177
+Signed-off-by: Minjae Kim <flowergom@gmail.com>
+---
+ Lib/ctypes/test/test_parameters.py | 43 ++++++++++++++++
+ .../2021-01-18-09-27-31.bpo-42938.4Zn4Mp.rst | 2 +
+ Modules/_ctypes/callproc.c | 51 +++++++------------
+ 3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
+ create mode 100644 Misc/NEWS.d/next/Security/2021-01-18-09-27-31.bpo-42938.4Zn4Mp.rst
+
+diff --git a/Lib/ctypes/test/test_parameters.py b/Lib/ctypes/test/test_parameters.py
+index e4c25fd880cef..531894fdec838 100644
+--- a/Lib/ctypes/test/test_parameters.py
++++ b/Lib/ctypes/test/test_parameters.py
+@@ -201,6 +201,49 @@ def __dict__(self):
+ with self.assertRaises(ZeroDivisionError):
+ WorseStruct().__setstate__({}, b'foo')
+
++ def test_parameter_repr(self):
++ from ctypes import (
++ c_bool,
++ c_char,
++ c_wchar,
++ c_byte,
++ c_ubyte,
++ c_short,
++ c_ushort,
++ c_int,
++ c_uint,
++ c_long,
++ c_ulong,
++ c_longlong,
++ c_ulonglong,
++ c_float,
++ c_double,
++ c_longdouble,
++ c_char_p,
++ c_wchar_p,
++ c_void_p,
++ )
++ self.assertRegex(repr(c_bool.from_param(True)), r"^<cparam '\?' at 0x[A-Fa-f0-9]+>$")
++ self.assertEqual(repr(c_char.from_param(97)), "<cparam 'c' ('a')>")
++ self.assertRegex(repr(c_wchar.from_param('a')), r"^<cparam 'u' at 0x[A-Fa-f0-9]+>$")
++ self.assertEqual(repr(c_byte.from_param(98)), "<cparam 'b' (98)>")
++ self.assertEqual(repr(c_ubyte.from_param(98)), "<cparam 'B' (98)>")
++ self.assertEqual(repr(c_short.from_param(511)), "<cparam 'h' (511)>")
++ self.assertEqual(repr(c_ushort.from_param(511)), "<cparam 'H' (511)>")
++ self.assertRegex(repr(c_int.from_param(20000)), r"^<cparam '[li]' \(20000\)>$")
++ self.assertRegex(repr(c_uint.from_param(20000)), r"^<cparam '[LI]' \(20000\)>$")
++ self.assertRegex(repr(c_long.from_param(20000)), r"^<cparam '[li]' \(20000\)>$")
++ self.assertRegex(repr(c_ulong.from_param(20000)), r"^<cparam '[LI]' \(20000\)>$")
++ self.assertRegex(repr(c_longlong.from_param(20000)), r"^<cparam '[liq]' \(20000\)>$")
++ self.assertRegex(repr(c_ulonglong.from_param(20000)), r"^<cparam '[LIQ]' \(20000\)>$")
++ self.assertEqual(repr(c_float.from_param(1.5)), "<cparam 'f' (1.5)>")
++ self.assertEqual(repr(c_double.from_param(1.5)), "<cparam 'd' (1.5)>")
++ self.assertEqual(repr(c_double.from_param(1e300)), "<cparam 'd' (1e+300)>")
++ self.assertRegex(repr(c_longdouble.from_param(1.5)), r"^<cparam ('d' \(1.5\)|'g' at 0x[A-Fa-f0-9]+)>$")
++ self.assertRegex(repr(c_char_p.from_param(b'hihi')), "^<cparam 'z' \(0x[A-Fa-f0-9]+\)>$")
++ self.assertRegex(repr(c_wchar_p.from_param('hihi')), "^<cparam 'Z' \(0x[A-Fa-f0-9]+\)>$")
++ self.assertRegex(repr(c_void_p.from_param(0x12)), r"^<cparam 'P' \(0x0*12\)>$")
++
+ ################################################################
+
+ if __name__ == '__main__':
+diff --git a/Misc/NEWS.d/next/Security/2021-01-18-09-27-31.bpo-42938.4Zn4Mp.rst b/Misc/NEWS.d/next/Security/2021-01-18-09-27-31.bpo-42938.4Zn4Mp.rst
+new file mode 100644
+index 0000000000000..7df65a156feab
+--- /dev/null
++++ b/Misc/NEWS.d/next/Security/2021-01-18-09-27-31.bpo-42938.4Zn4Mp.rst
+@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
++Avoid static buffers when computing the repr of :class:`ctypes.c_double` and
++:class:`ctypes.c_longdouble` values.
+diff --git a/Modules/_ctypes/callproc.c b/Modules/_ctypes/callproc.c
+index 40a05a44edd4c..56ccc2f1e0b5d 100644
+--- a/Modules/_ctypes/callproc.c
++++ b/Modules/_ctypes/callproc.c
+@@ -487,58 +487,47 @@ is_literal_char(unsigned char c)
+ static PyObject *
+ PyCArg_repr(PyCArgObject *self)
+ {
+- char buffer[256];
+ switch(self->tag) {
+ case 'b':
+ case 'B':
+- sprintf(buffer, "<cparam '%c' (%d)>",
++ return PyUnicode_FromFormat("<cparam '%c' (%d)>",
+ self->tag, self->value.b);
+- break;
+ case 'h':
+ case 'H':
+- sprintf(buffer, "<cparam '%c' (%d)>",
++ return PyUnicode_FromFormat("<cparam '%c' (%d)>",
+ self->tag, self->value.h);
+- break;
+ case 'i':
+ case 'I':
+- sprintf(buffer, "<cparam '%c' (%d)>",
++ return PyUnicode_FromFormat("<cparam '%c' (%d)>",
+ self->tag, self->value.i);
+- break;
+ case 'l':
+ case 'L':
+- sprintf(buffer, "<cparam '%c' (%ld)>",
++ return PyUnicode_FromFormat("<cparam '%c' (%ld)>",
+ self->tag, self->value.l);
+- break;
+
+ case 'q':
+ case 'Q':
+- sprintf(buffer,
+-#ifdef MS_WIN32
+- "<cparam '%c' (%I64d)>",
+-#else
+- "<cparam '%c' (%lld)>",
+-#endif
++ return PyUnicode_FromFormat("<cparam '%c' (%lld)>",
+ self->tag, self->value.q);
+- break;
+ case 'd':
+- sprintf(buffer, "<cparam '%c' (%f)>",
+- self->tag, self->value.d);
+- break;
+- case 'f':
+- sprintf(buffer, "<cparam '%c' (%f)>",
+- self->tag, self->value.f);
+- break;
+-
++ case 'f': {
++ PyObject *f = PyFloat_FromDouble((self->tag == 'f') ? self->value.f : self->value.d);
++ if (f == NULL) {
++ return NULL;
++ }
++ PyObject *result = PyUnicode_FromFormat("<cparam '%c' (%R)>", self->tag, f);
++ Py_DECREF(f);
++ return result;
++ }
+ case 'c':
+ if (is_literal_char((unsigned char)self->value.c)) {
+- sprintf(buffer, "<cparam '%c' ('%c')>",
++ return PyUnicode_FromFormat("<cparam '%c' ('%c')>",
+ self->tag, self->value.c);
+ }
+ else {
+- sprintf(buffer, "<cparam '%c' ('\\x%02x')>",
++ return PyUnicode_FromFormat("<cparam '%c' ('\\x%02x')>",
+ self->tag, (unsigned char)self->value.c);
+ }
+- break;
+
+ /* Hm, are these 'z' and 'Z' codes useful at all?
+ Shouldn't they be replaced by the functionality of c_string
+@@ -547,22 +536,20 @@ PyCArg_repr(PyCArgObject *self)
+ case 'z':
+ case 'Z':
+ case 'P':
+- sprintf(buffer, "<cparam '%c' (%p)>",
++ return PyUnicode_FromFormat("<cparam '%c' (%p)>",
+ self->tag, self->value.p);
+ break;
+
+ default:
+ if (is_literal_char((unsigned char)self->tag)) {
+- sprintf(buffer, "<cparam '%c' at %p>",
++ return PyUnicode_FromFormat("<cparam '%c' at %p>",
+ (unsigned char)self->tag, (void *)self);
+ }
+ else {
+- sprintf(buffer, "<cparam 0x%02x at %p>",
++ return PyUnicode_FromFormat("<cparam 0x%02x at %p>",
+ (unsigned char)self->tag, (void *)self);
+ }
+- break;
+ }
+- return PyUnicode_FromString(buffer);
+ }
+
+ static PyMemberDef PyCArgType_members[] = {
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3_3.8.2.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3_3.8.2.bb
index a448b3ed97..646e271014 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3_3.8.2.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3_3.8.2.bb
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ SRC_URI = "http://www.python.org/ftp/python/${PV}/Python-${PV}.tar.xz \
file://CVE-2020-14422.patch \
file://CVE-2020-26116.patch \
file://CVE-2020-27619.patch \
+ file://CVE-2021-3177.patch \
"
SRC_URI_append_class-native = " \
--
2.24.3 (Apple Git-128)
next reply other threads:[~2021-02-26 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-26 13:58 Minjae Kim [this message]
2021-03-01 14:21 ` [OE-core][dunfell] [PATCH] python3: fix CVE-2021-3177 Martin Jansa
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-02-01 5:01 Anuj Mittal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210226135826.5811-1-flowergom@gmail.com \
--to=flowergom@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.