From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/4] gpiolib: Unify the checks on fwnode type
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 17:34:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210302153451.50593-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> (raw)
We have (historically) different approaches how we identify the type
of a given fwnode. Let's standardize them across the library code.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index adf55db080d8..484ac92903ab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -3678,11 +3678,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_gpiod_get_index);
*/
int gpiod_count(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
{
+ const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(dev);
int count = -ENOENT;
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev && dev->of_node)
+ if (is_of_node(fwnode))
count = of_gpio_get_count(dev, con_id);
- else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) && dev && ACPI_HANDLE(dev))
+ else if (is_acpi_node(fwnode))
count = acpi_gpio_count(dev, con_id);
if (count < 0)
@@ -3820,18 +3821,17 @@ struct gpio_desc *__must_check gpiod_get_index(struct device *dev,
int ret;
/* Maybe we have a device name, maybe not */
const char *devname = dev ? dev_name(dev) : "?";
+ const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev ? dev_fwnode(dev) : NULL;
dev_dbg(dev, "GPIO lookup for consumer %s\n", con_id);
- if (dev) {
- /* Using device tree? */
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node) {
- dev_dbg(dev, "using device tree for GPIO lookup\n");
- desc = of_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &lookupflags);
- } else if (ACPI_COMPANION(dev)) {
- dev_dbg(dev, "using ACPI for GPIO lookup\n");
- desc = acpi_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &flags, &lookupflags);
- }
+ /* Using device tree? */
+ if (is_of_node(fwnode)) {
+ dev_dbg(dev, "using device tree for GPIO lookup\n");
+ desc = of_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &lookupflags);
+ } else if (is_acpi_node(fwnode)) {
+ dev_dbg(dev, "using ACPI for GPIO lookup\n");
+ desc = acpi_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &flags, &lookupflags);
}
/*
@@ -3915,9 +3915,6 @@ struct gpio_desc *fwnode_get_named_gpiod(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
struct gpio_desc *desc = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
int ret;
- if (!fwnode)
- return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
-
if (is_of_node(fwnode)) {
desc = gpiod_get_from_of_node(to_of_node(fwnode),
propname, index,
@@ -3933,7 +3930,8 @@ struct gpio_desc *fwnode_get_named_gpiod(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
acpi_gpio_update_gpiod_flags(&dflags, &info);
acpi_gpio_update_gpiod_lookup_flags(&lflags, &info);
- }
+ } else
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
/* Currently only ACPI takes this path */
ret = gpiod_request(desc, label);
--
2.30.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-03-03 5:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-02 15:34 Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2021-03-02 15:34 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] gpiolib: Move of_node operations to gpiolib-of and correct fwnode use Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-03 9:15 ` Linus Walleij
2021-03-02 15:34 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] gpiolib: Introduce acpi_gpio_dev_init() and call it from core Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-03 9:16 ` Linus Walleij
2021-03-02 15:34 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] gpiolib: Reuse device's fwnode to create IRQ domain Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-03 9:22 ` Linus Walleij
2021-03-03 9:35 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-04 8:06 ` Linus Walleij
2021-03-04 12:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-04 13:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-04 15:40 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-04 15:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-02 15:48 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] gpiolib: Unify the checks on fwnode type Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-03 9:11 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210302153451.50593-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.