All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Why do kprobes and uprobes singlestep?
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:27:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210303132749.GA28955@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQJoTMqWK=kNFyTbjhoo22QD81KXnPxUjiCXhQaNhbK+8A@mail.gmail.com>

On 03/02, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>
> Especially if such tightening will come with performance boost for
> uprobe on a nop and unprobe at the start (which is typically push or
> alu on %sp).
> That would be a great step forward.

Just in case, nop and push are emulated without additional overhead.

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-03 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-23 23:24 Why do kprobes and uprobes singlestep? Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-24  1:17 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-02-24 19:45   ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-25  2:22     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-02-25  6:03       ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-25  9:11         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-01 14:08       ` [RFC PATCH 0/1] x86/kprobes: Remoev single-step trap from x86 kprobes Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-01 14:08         ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] x86/kprobes: Use int3 instead of debug trap for single-step Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-02  8:06           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-02  8:38           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-02  8:41           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-02  8:54             ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-02 12:51               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-02 13:58               ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-02 15:25       ` [PATCH -tip 0/3] x86/kprobes: Remoev single-step trap from x86 kprobes Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-02 15:25         ` [PATCH -tip 1/3] x86/kprobes: Retrieve correct opcode for group instruction Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-23 15:15           ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-02 15:25         ` [PATCH -tip 2/3] x86/kprobes: Identify far indirect JMP correctly Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-23 15:15           ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-02 15:25         ` [PATCH -tip 3/3] x86/kprobes: Use int3 instead of debug trap for single-step Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-23 15:15           ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-17 14:55         ` [PATCH -tip 0/3] x86/kprobes: Remoev single-step trap from x86 kprobes Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-17 16:26           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-17 17:45             ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-25  9:59     ` Why do kprobes and uprobes singlestep? Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-01 16:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2021-03-02  1:36   ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-02 20:24     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-03-02 21:02       ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-03  1:22         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-03-03  1:46           ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-03  2:18             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-03-03 13:27               ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2021-03-03 18:11               ` Daniel Xu
2021-03-03 19:14                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-02 20:25     ` Oleg Nesterov
2021-03-02 20:35       ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-02 20:28     ` Oleg Nesterov
2021-03-02  2:22   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-02  2:48     ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-02 20:31     ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210303132749.GA28955@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.