From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Mark Tomlinson <mark.tomlinson@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Cc: pablo@netfilter.org, kadlec@netfilter.org, fw@strlen.de,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Revert "netfilter: x_tables: Switch synchronization to RCU"
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 08:44:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210304074452.GI17911@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210304013116.8420-3-mark.tomlinson@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Mark Tomlinson <mark.tomlinson@alliedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:
> This reverts commit cc00bcaa589914096edef7fb87ca5cee4a166b5c.
>
> This (and the preceding) patch basically re-implemented the RCU
> mechanisms of patch 784544739a25. That patch was replaced because of the
> performance problems that it created when replacing tables. Now, we have
> the same issue: the call to synchronize_rcu() makes replacing tables
> slower by as much as an order of magnitude.
Can you give roigh numbers?
> See https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/151796/ for why using RCU is
> not a good idea.
Please, no link.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-04 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-04 1:31 [PATCH 0/3] Don't use RCU for x_tables synchronization Mark Tomlinson
2021-03-04 1:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] Revert "netfilter: x_tables: Update remaining dereference to RCU" Mark Tomlinson
2021-03-04 7:43 ` Florian Westphal
2021-03-04 1:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] Revert "netfilter: x_tables: Switch synchronization " Mark Tomlinson
2021-03-04 7:44 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2021-03-04 1:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] netfilter: x_tables: Use correct memory barriers Mark Tomlinson
2021-03-04 7:46 ` Florian Westphal
2021-03-05 3:30 ` Mark Tomlinson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210304074452.GI17911@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.tomlinson@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.