From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.yoctoproject.org (mail.yoctoproject.org [198.145.29.25]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.1176.1614886215101464968 for ; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 11:30:15 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=none, err=permanent DNS error (domain: denix.org, ip: 198.145.29.25, mailfrom: denis@denix.org) Received: from mailout4.zoneedit.com (mailout4.zoneedit.com [64.68.198.64]) by mail.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCE2338C0845 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 19:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout4.zoneedit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA32E40BEA; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 19:30:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailout4.zoneedit.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmo14-pco.easydns.vpn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 210cp81PtcC6; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 19:30:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.denix.org (pool-100-15-86-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net [100.15.86.127]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout4.zoneedit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 913CD40AB7; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 19:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F144E174524; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 14:30:09 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 14:30:09 -0500 From: "Denys Dmytriyenko" To: Nishanth Menon Cc: "meta-ti @ yoctoproject . org" , "Bajjuri, Praneeth" Subject: Re: [PATCH dunfell/dunfell-next/master 0/2] linux-ti-mainline: Move Linux to v5.11 Message-ID: <20210304193009.GG4892@denix.org> References: <20210304042808.9389-1-nm@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210304042808.9389-1-nm@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In the subject, -next is implied. It is part of the process (and is up to the maintainer to follow), but you just specify the target branches you need this in - dunfell and master. On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 10:28:06PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote: > Hi, > > A series of minimal patches to bump up recision to the latest kernel -> Recision? You probably meant revision? :) > we will need to maintain upstream-tools and kernel in sync on all > branches involved ofcourse. > > NOTE: with kernels > 5.9 (aka 5.10, 5.11...) we do have problems with > cryptodev and kernel - we will have to try and see how best to integrate > those as well. This is solved in master of oe-core[1] by moving to 1.12, > however gatesgarth, dunfell are on 1.11 and 1.10 revs respectively > which wont work since the PR integrated version is 1.12 PV, not PR. > Nishanth Menon (2): > linux-ti-mainline: Bump up ti-upstream-tools SRCREV > linux-ti-mainline: Bump kernel version to v5.11 Ok, as long as you are not bumping linux-ti-staging, which is still the default kernel in meta-ti and 5.4 is being preferred, you should be fine with cryptodev "fix" in meta-arago. Will need to revisit that later, if/when 5.10 LTS is ready to become the default in meta-ti dunfell... > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-mainline_git.bb | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > [1] http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/recipes-kernel/cryptodev?h=master > [2] https://github.com/cryptodev-linux/cryptodev-linux/pull/55 > -- > 2.25.1.377.g2d2118b814c1 > -- Regards, Denys Dmytriyenko PGP: 0x420902729A92C964 - https://denix.org/0x420902729A92C964 Fingerprint: 25FC E4A5 8A72 2F69 1186 6D76 4209 0272 9A92 C964