All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Analysis of build results for 2021-03-03
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 23:26:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210304222634.GP2275@scaer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210304224926.45aa4056@windsurf.home>

Thomas, All,

On 2021-03-04 22:49 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:
> >   riscv64    |      fuse-overlayfs-1.4.0      | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/cfef18f3adf51edaedbbd193efbff19aebdfe508 |     
> 
> This is a bug in uClibc: it implements renameat() only if the
> SYS_renameat system call exists. If only the SYS_renameat2 system call
> exists, the renameat() function is not implemented. Musl does this
> correctly:
> 
> int renameat(int oldfd, const char *old, int newfd, const char *new)
> {
> #ifdef SYS_renameat
>         return syscall(SYS_renameat, oldfd, old, newfd, new);
> #else
>         return syscall(SYS_renameat2, oldfd, old, newfd, new, 0);
> #endif
> }
> 
> uclibc needs to be patched here.

But what about external toolchains? We can't know whether they would
carry such a patch or not...

> >   aarch64    |     host-sentry-cli-1.57.0     | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/739d625673f9b2ce2d915ecdc21910c62618d145 |     
> > microblazeel |     host-sentry-cli-1.57.0     | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/b1779a7d46f6ee9c06864c3ca252f1cdad47cf08 |     
> >     i586     |     host-sentry-cli-1.57.0     | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/a5fe402e3f4e538eb4584f345b029ef12ad43348 |     
> >     arc      |     host-sentry-cli-1.57.0     | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/abd3f886335f146ff6f16370484106bd8a205bda |     
> What do we do with this? The only way to solve that is to have the
> Cargo vendoring support, which we won't have for 2021.02. Should we
> drop this package ?

I am all in favour of dropping sentry-cli. It is a host-only package
with no in-tree users. When it was submitted, no rationale was given to
justify for having it upstream (although I suspect it may be helpfull
with traces generated with sentry-native).

In any case, this package is not playing nice with our infra, and our
infra is not ready to accomodate such a package yet.

Let's drop it for now...

Since you have it in your vendoring branch, you can still keep uisng it
to validate your code.

> >    nios2     |         libgeos-3.9.0          | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/a05fdf1958f93a206c5c66c7f636b6650683626d | ORPH
> Some more nios2 toolchain issue.
> Should we get rid of nios2 support entirely ?

How prevalent is nios2? What's the support in the kernel? Some time ago,
quite a few old architectures were dropped; IIR, a few others were put
on trial to see if they were really still alive (but apart an LWN
article https://lwn.net/Articles/748074/ I can't find that list...)

> >     arm      | toolchain-external-linaro-a... | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/d9b9a4b7c3660bd730a19ab09e44f24bc29e3f40 | ORPH
> >     arm      | toolchain-external-linaro-a... | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/13f9a551f5ac911e7daa2a382b0683d81486cffa | ORPH
> toolchain is gone ?

I can get it from here;

    wget 'https://releases.linaro.org/components/toolchain/binaries/7.3-2018.05/arm-linux-gnueabihf/gcc-linaro-7.3.1-2018.05-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz'
    --2021-03-04 23:03:07--  https://releases.linaro.org/components/toolchain/binaries/7.3-2018.05/arm-linux-gnueabihf/gcc-linaro-7.3.1-2018.05-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz
    Resolving releases.linaro.org (releases.linaro.org)...
    52.215.200.125
    Connecting to releases.linaro.org (releases.linaro.org)|52.215.200.125|:443... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Found
    Location: https://publishing-ie-linaro-org.s3.amazonaws.com/releases/components/toolchain/binaries/7.3-2018.05/arm-linux-gnueabihf/gcc-linaro-7.3.1-2018.05-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz?Signature=qIOVqoIXcsiFVTalQoTG%2FdNwu9A%3D&Expires=1614895479&AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIELXV2RYNAHFUP7A [following]
    --2021-03-04 23:03:09--  https://publishing-ie-linaro-org.s3.amazonaws.com/releases/components/toolchain/binaries/7.3-2018.05/arm-linux-gnueabihf/gcc-linaro-7.3.1-2018.05-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz?Signature=qIOVqoIXcsiFVTalQoTG%2FdNwu9A%3D&Expires=1614895479&AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIELXV2RYNAHFUP7A
    Resolving publishing-ie-linaro-org.s3.amazonaws.com (publishing-ie-linaro-org.s3.amazonaws.com)... 52.218.41.226
    Connecting to publishing-ie-linaro-org.s3.amazonaws.com (publishing-ie-linaro-org.s3.amazonaws.com)|52.218.41.226|:443... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 107031352 (102M) [application/octet-stream]
    Saving to: ?gcc-linaro-7.3.1-2018.05-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz?

    gcc-linaro-7.3.1-2018.05-x 100%[=====================================>] 102.07M  17.0MB/s    in 5.8s

    2021-03-04 23:03:15 (17.5 MB/s) - ?gcc-linaro-7.3.1-2018.05-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz? saved [107031352/107031352]

Temporary glitch in the network? Goblins? ;-)

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

-- 
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___               |
| +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v   conspiracy.  |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-04 22:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-04  8:15 [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Daily results for 2021-03-03 Thomas Petazzoni
2021-03-04 21:49 ` [Buildroot] Analysis of build " Thomas Petazzoni
2021-03-04 22:26   ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2021-03-05  8:01     ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05  8:36     ` Peter Korsgaard
2021-03-05  7:56   ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05  8:55     ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05  9:13       ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05  9:22     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2021-03-05 16:01       ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05 16:13         ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05 16:52           ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05  9:48   ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2021-03-05 15:10   ` Heiko Thiery
2021-03-05 15:14     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2021-03-05 15:38       ` Heiko Thiery

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210304222634.GP2275@scaer \
    --to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.