All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio: Depend on MMU
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 19:12:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210308191209.6a355b90.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210308105913.6f5f4ac7@omen.home.shazbot.org>

On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 10:59:13 -0700
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 09:46:49 +0100
> Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 21:30:03 -0400
> > Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1 does not compile with !MMU:
> > > 
> > > ../drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c: In function 'follow_fault_pfn':
> > > ../drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c:536:22: error: implicit declaration of function 'pte_write'; did you mean 'vfs_write'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > 
> > > So require it.
> > > 
> > > Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/vfio/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> > > index 90c0525b1e0cf4..67d0bf4efa1606 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig
> > > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ config VFIO_VIRQFD
> > >  menuconfig VFIO
> > >  	tristate "VFIO Non-Privileged userspace driver framework"
> > >  	select IOMMU_API
> > > -	select VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1 if (X86 || S390 || ARM || ARM64)
> > > +	select VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1 if MMU && (X86 || S390 || ARM || ARM64)
> > >  	help
> > >  	  VFIO provides a framework for secure userspace device drivers.
> > >  	  See Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst for more details.    
> > 
> > Actually, I'm wondering how much sense vfio makes on !MMU at all? (And
> > maybe just merge this with your patch that switches IOMMU_API from a
> > depend to a select, because that is the change that makes the MMU
> > dependency required?)  
> 
> We do have the no-iommu code in vfio, potentially it's useful for !MMU,
> I guess.  It seems a little arbitrary to remove it without a known
> breakage at this point.  Thanks,
> 
> Alex

Well, in practice, I think we had an implicit dependency on MMU before
(everything selecting IOMMU_API depended on MMU.) If we think !MMU
would be useful for the no-iommu use case, we can certainly restrict
the dependency to VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1.


      reply	other threads:[~2021-03-08 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-05  1:30 [PATCH] vfio: Depend on MMU Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-05  8:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-03-05 23:11   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-08 18:14     ` Cornelia Huck
2021-03-08 18:23       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-08 17:59   ` Alex Williamson
2021-03-08 18:12     ` Cornelia Huck [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210308191209.6a355b90.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.