From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Ti Zhou <x2019cwm@stfx.ca>, Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@huawei.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 02/10] tick/nohz: Add tick_nohz_full_this_cpu()
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:37:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210311123708.23501-3-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210311123708.23501-1-frederic@kernel.org>
Optimize further the check for local full dynticks CPU. Testing directly
tick_nohz_full_cpu(smp_processor_id()) is suboptimal because the
compiler first fetches the CPU number and only then processes the
static key.
It's best to evaluate the static branch before anything. Provide with a
function that handles that correctly and convert some users along.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@huawei.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
include/linux/tick.h | 11 ++++++++++-
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 12 +++++-------
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
index 7340613c7eff..bfc96cbe955c 100644
--- a/include/linux/tick.h
+++ b/include/linux/tick.h
@@ -193,6 +193,14 @@ static inline bool tick_nohz_full_cpu(int cpu)
return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tick_nohz_full_mask);
}
+static inline bool tick_nohz_full_this_cpu(void)
+{
+ if (!tick_nohz_full_enabled())
+ return false;
+
+ return cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), tick_nohz_full_mask);
+}
+
static inline void tick_nohz_full_add_cpus_to(struct cpumask *mask)
{
if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
@@ -271,6 +279,7 @@ extern void __init tick_nohz_full_setup(cpumask_var_t cpumask);
#else
static inline bool tick_nohz_full_enabled(void) { return false; }
static inline bool tick_nohz_full_cpu(int cpu) { return false; }
+static inline bool tick_nohz_full_this_cpu(void) { return false; }
static inline void tick_nohz_full_add_cpus_to(struct cpumask *mask) { }
static inline void tick_nohz_dep_set_cpu(int cpu, enum tick_dep_bits bit) { }
@@ -296,7 +305,7 @@ static inline void tick_nohz_full_setup(cpumask_var_t cpumask) { }
static inline void tick_nohz_task_switch(void)
{
- if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
+ if (tick_nohz_full_this_cpu())
__tick_nohz_task_switch();
}
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 22b6a46818cf..af76cfa51b57 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct irq_work, nohz_full_kick_work) =
*/
static void tick_nohz_full_kick(void)
{
- if (!tick_nohz_full_cpu(smp_processor_id()))
+ if (!tick_nohz_full_this_cpu())
return;
irq_work_queue(this_cpu_ptr(&nohz_full_kick_work));
@@ -452,9 +452,6 @@ void __tick_nohz_task_switch(void)
local_irq_save(flags);
- if (!tick_nohz_full_cpu(smp_processor_id()))
- goto out;
-
ts = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_sched);
if (ts->tick_stopped) {
@@ -462,7 +459,6 @@ void __tick_nohz_task_switch(void)
atomic_read(¤t->signal->tick_dep_mask))
tick_nohz_full_kick();
}
-out:
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
@@ -929,14 +925,16 @@ static void tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(struct tick_sched *ts, ktime_t now)
static void tick_nohz_full_update_tick(struct tick_sched *ts)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
- int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ int cpu;
- if (!tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu))
+ if (!tick_nohz_full_this_cpu())
return;
if (!ts->tick_stopped && ts->nohz_mode == NOHZ_MODE_INACTIVE)
return;
+ cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
if (can_stop_full_tick(cpu, ts))
tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(ts, cpu);
else if (ts->tick_stopped)
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-11 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-11 12:36 [PATCH 00/10] tick/nohz updates Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:36 ` [PATCH 01/10] tick/nohz: Prevent tick_nohz_get_sleep_length() from returning negative value Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-16 12:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-16 13:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-16 14:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-16 14:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-16 15:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-16 15:57 ` 回复: " Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-16 16:08 ` Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-16 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-17 21:49 ` Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-25 13:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-25 18:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-25 19:18 ` Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-25 19:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-25 20:37 ` Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-26 17:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-26 17:53 ` Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-26 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-26 22:53 ` Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-29 12:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-29 14:49 ` Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-11 12:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2021-03-16 12:28 ` [PATCH 02/10] tick/nohz: Add tick_nohz_full_this_cpu() Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-16 13:05 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 03/10] tick/nohz: Conditionally restart tick on idle exit Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 04/10] tick/nohz: Remove superflous check for CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 05/10] tick/nohz: Update idle_exittime on actual idle exit Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 06/10] timer: Report ignored local enqueue in nohz mode Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-16 15:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-25 13:07 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 07/10] tick/nohz: Update nohz_full Kconfig help Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 08/10] tick/nohz: Only wakeup a single target cpu when kicking a task Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 09/10] tick/nohz: Change signal tick dependency to wakeup CPUs of member tasks Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 10/10] tick/nohz: Kick only _queued_ task whose tick dependency is updated Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210311123708.23501-3-frederic@kernel.org \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x2019cwm@stfx.ca \
--cc=yeyunfeng@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.