Re: [PATCH 10/13] rcu/nocb: Delete bypass_timer upon nocb_gp wakeup

[Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>]

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:53:36PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 11:17:02PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 05:24:56PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 01:10:08AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > > A NOCB-gp wake up can safely delete the nocb_bypass_timer. nocb_gp_wait()
> > > > is going to check again the bypass state and rearm the bypass timer if
> > > > necessary.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> > > > Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> > > > Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
> > > > Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> > > > Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
> > > > Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> > > 
> > > Give that you delete this code a couple of patches later in this series,
> > > why not just leave it out entirely?  ;-)
> > 
> > It's not exactly deleted later, it's rather merged within the
> > "del_timer(&rdp_gp->nocb_timer)".
> > 
> > The purpose of that patch is to make it clear that we explicitly cancel
> > the nocb_bypass_timer here before we do it implicitly later with the
> > merge of nocb_bypass_timer into nocb_timer.
> > 
> > We could drop that patch, the resulting code in the end of the patchset
> > will be the same of course but the behaviour detail described here might
> > slip out of the reviewers attention :-)
> > 
> 
> How about merging the timers first and adding those small improvements
> later? i.e. move patch #12 #13 right after #7 (IIUC, #7 is the last
> requirement you need for merging timers)

Hmm, nope, patches 9 and 10 are actually preparation work for timers merge.
In fact they could even be skipped and timers could be merged directly but I
wanted the unified behaviour to be fully explicit for reviewers through those
incremental changes before merging the timers together.

>, and then patch #8~#11 just follow

Patch 8 really need to stay where it is because it is an important limitation
on nocb de-offloading that can be removed right after patch 7 (which itself
removes the sole reason for rdp leader to remain nocb) and it doesn't depend
on the timers unification that comes after.

> 
> Just my 2 cents. The overall patchset looks good to me ;-)
> 
> Feel free to add
> 
> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>

Thanks a lot for checking that!