All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the arm64 tree
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:03:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210322180329.GA12107@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210322174023.602a110b@canb.auug.org.au>

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 05:40:23PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   87143f404f33 ("arm64: mm: use XN table mapping attributes for the linear region")
> 
> from the arm64 tree and commit:
> 
>   0a2634348ef8 ("set_memory: allow querying whether set_direct_map_*() is actually enabled")
> 
> from the akpm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

The resolution looks fine. Thanks Stephen.

-- 
Catalin

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-22 18:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-22  6:40 linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the arm64 tree Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-22 18:03 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-06-07  9:25 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-07 10:29 ` Will Deacon
2021-01-28  8:08 Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-30  7:28 Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-30  7:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-30 11:58   ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-26  7:06 Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-26  7:25 ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-03-05  5:50 Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-05  9:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-01-23  5:43 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-07  7:41 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-07  8:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-04-07  9:25   ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210322180329.GA12107@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.