From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D77C433DB for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 09:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85BE1619B1 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 09:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229508AbhCWJDU (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 05:03:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34552 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229871AbhCWJCz (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 05:02:55 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x52e.google.com (mail-ed1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B364C061574 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 02:02:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id bf3so22566550edb.6 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 02:02:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=PwQ1zGRRJZeMl0raQjRJkQLHTRA1rJVceDRF8uADlX8=; b=Y+RXJsq2EZJG/tEdyfA9tkHPOgqSBoirN14I+t5ux9volZ7wMGYwg1CXqneAk5jl5N m2Lj0aJL6jzGB/IImHo8Cu0EY533UohVq4kwOUyvexQi/WuNty1LRnqF/IDGCpBA3Vyp JySfp1Qk8AoQANclcS/CA1zMtAPrdcCWUDUqZY2eLK20daHsW6NGa6ZFXKLBa1fJA2GJ CZUV6Zj8WF7AtUIreD+QkoxdM5yw6gU1BlDvA8aT+sqUtoX32tLJoRosoByDUAElzGLv S+05QIlrLJ1gg7Spp4Sh3BkYVrjxyJU/z4AsHnx+4KMw0XxDlGS2yMgYgVHoEwYgrHWJ SyeA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=PwQ1zGRRJZeMl0raQjRJkQLHTRA1rJVceDRF8uADlX8=; b=OwhgkYzcfjzMU84aTf6+bDDr9ouQxuMpd2vVHewpyG5ZrBU0qou7+4wNYV4KLoK2jb dspb6xGAXVuExVCRJSEfpPFLAqbWj1bU3mC2YCwk2rjFuw2jCfULf1ywKHcmV7vLHQT/ pvhRSL7ODPCxKNdaZYSQ8o1SMV1KBvN7jVVOzXOeIm5l3jIUOKMD3Nbc3+Euvq+zMU5S G70lpMfThB4wMMoO9ig+/EsujD2gdT9kNhosJ359SNVN2X4efwMZrd8Mtw1tuyeQdGO3 F1TR0wLjQxhXptAentHf5HBSHNnGpGplq4UhMCfGZD6gZ/2D1fgP4ltuDNkfsK5yVl+j Hvlg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533o9zDbZJYodV/EhGBtxNLyivpU7ecn4U8MS3RGW7smkhvrlM6v EtmfP4ry7EFQM2PbxDzHErLHO4CQiVejzg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzmMiYLGy8AK1yl217amnbVtAFik1HvZcx+liE4IQCs4pMsLx/whvEZKMD/RdLvp7G2NNiWjA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3047:: with SMTP id bu7mr3542853edb.227.1616490174274; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 02:02:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dell ([91.110.221.180]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lm24sm10948540ejb.53.2021.03.23.02.02.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 02:02:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 09:02:52 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Thierry Reding Cc: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] pwm: Patches I consider ready for the next merge window Message-ID: <20210323090252.GI2916463@dell> References: <20210319102852.101209-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20210323071929.GD2916463@dell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 23 Mar 2021, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 07:19:29AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Mar 2021, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:28:38AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > this is the set of patches that are open on the list for some time. > > > > Lee suggested to resend them. > > > > > > > > @Thierry: I'm unsure what is the best way to nag. Is it really > > > > resending? Or does this just result mostly in overhead because the > > > > patches are still open in patchwork and it adds copies to your mailbox? > > > > (Another downside is that taking the patches from this thread results in > > > > recording a newer Author Date compared to picking up the originals.) > > > > > > I use patchwork extensively for tracking, so merely resending patches so > > > that they float to the top of my inbox isn't useful in itself. Patches > > > do, by the way, float to the top of my inbox when you just reply to them > > > (e.g. by pinging). Resending a particular series is fine because it's > > > then easy to mark the old version as "superseded". Sending a collection > > > of patch such as this is a bit more annoying because now the duplicates > > > are spread about a bit more in patchwork, so it's a bit more work to get > > > patchwork cleaned up. But it's not that bad, so no harm done. > > > > > > Usually when I look at patchwork I will look at the A/F/R/T column and > > > the more flags I see there, the more likely I will be to go and apply > > > it. Anything else I will go and look at myself and comment and/or apply > > > or sometimes wait for someone else to review. > > > > > > Perhaps a better way to nag me would be to delegate patches that you've > > > reviewed or think are ready to me, which would make them stand out more > > > among the others. > > > > It's not Uwe's fault, it's mine. > > > > Since some of Uwe's patches had been left unreviewed for several > > weeks, I asked him to collect up all of his dangling patches and > > submit this resend for *me* to review. > > Like I said, it's not a big deal. And I'm also aware that this is misery > of my own making, so no worries. > > > As someone who does not use Patchwork, I find this to be the simplest > > and cleanest method of patch collation. Going by your almost > > immediate reply, I guess it had a nice desired side-effect. :) > > Indeed, it achieved the desired effect, so can't argue about its > effectiveness. =) =:D -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog