From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Khalid Aziz <khalid@gonehiking.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] block: refactor the bounce buffering code
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 19:13:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210324181307.GA15902@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YFt/7BdzecUmdySU@t480-pf1aa2c2.linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 07:07:40PM +0100, Benjamin Block wrote:
> But map_request() -> multipath_clone_and_map() -> dm_dispatch_clone_request()
> doesn't call blk_mq_submit_bio() for requests that have been queued in a
> request based mpath device. The requests gets cloned and then dispatched
> on the lower queue. Or am I missing something?
Indeed. I keep forgetting about the fact that dm-mpath bypassed
the normal submit_bio_noacct path.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-24 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-18 6:39 start removing block bounce buffering support Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-18 6:39 ` [PATCH 1/8] aha1542: use a local bounce buffer Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-18 6:39 ` [PATCH 2/8] Buslogic: remove ISA support Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-18 6:39 ` [PATCH 3/8] BusLogic: reject broken old firmware that requires ISA-style bounce buffering Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-18 6:39 ` [PATCH 4/8] advansys: remove ISA support Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-18 11:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-18 12:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-18 14:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-18 6:39 ` [PATCH 5/8] scsi: remove the unchecked_isa_dma flag Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-18 6:39 ` [PATCH 6/8] block: remove BLK_BOUNCE_ISA support Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-18 6:39 ` [PATCH 7/8] block: refactor the bounce buffering code Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-18 11:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-03-18 12:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-24 17:40 ` Benjamin Block
2021-03-24 17:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-24 18:07 ` Benjamin Block
2021-03-24 18:13 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-03-18 6:39 ` [PATCH 8/8] block: stop calling blk_queue_bounce for passthrough requests Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-03-26 5:58 start removing block bounce buffering support v2 Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-26 5:58 ` [PATCH 7/8] block: refactor the bounce buffering code Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-29 6:34 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-03-31 7:29 start removing block bounce buffering support v3 Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-31 7:30 ` [PATCH 7/8] block: refactor the bounce buffering code Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210324181307.GA15902@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bblock@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=khalid@gonehiking.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rainbow-software.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.