All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	syzbot+8fede7e30c7cee0de139@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: not create too many partitions
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:02:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210326130248.GA18275@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210326085954.474119-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 04:59:54PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Commit a33df75c6328 ("block: use an xarray for disk->part_tbl") drops
> check on max supported partitions number, and allows partition with
> bigger partition number to be added. However, ->bd_partno is defined
> as u8, so partition index of xarray table may not match with ->bd_partno.
> Then delete_partition() may delete one unmatched partition, and caused
> use-after-free.
> 
> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> Reported-by: syzbot+8fede7e30c7cee0de139@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: a33df75c6328 ("block: use an xarray for disk->part_tbl")
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
> Another fix is to define ->bd_partno as u32, not sure if we need to
> support so many partitions.
> 
>  block/partitions/core.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/block/partitions/core.c b/block/partitions/core.c
> index 1a7558917c47..933d47105b64 100644
> --- a/block/partitions/core.c
> +++ b/block/partitions/core.c
> @@ -322,6 +322,10 @@ static struct block_device *add_partition(struct gendisk *disk, int partno,
>  	const char *dname;
>  	int err;
>  
> +	/* disk_max_parts() is zero during initialization, ignore if so */
> +	if (disk_max_parts(disk) && (partno + 1) > disk_max_parts(disk))
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);

disk->minors is set in __alloc_disk_node, so AFAICS it can't ever be 0
when add_partition is called.  So I think this should be just:

	if (partno >= disk_max_parts(disk))
		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);

otherwise this looks good.

      reply	other threads:[~2021-03-26 13:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-26  8:59 [PATCH] block: not create too many partitions Ming Lei
2021-03-26 13:02 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210326130248.GA18275@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=syzbot+8fede7e30c7cee0de139@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.