From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
thuth@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 03/16] s390x: css: simplify skipping tests on no device
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 14:44:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210406144405.09647bb4.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1617694853-6881-4-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 09:40:40 +0200
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> We will have to test if a device is present for every tests
> in the future.
> Let's provide separate the first tests from the test loop and
> skip the remaining tests if no device is present.
What about the following patch description:
"We keep adding tests that act upon a concrete device, and we have to
test that a device is present for all of those.
Instead, just skip all of the tests requiring a device if we were not
able to set it up in the first place. The enumeration test will already
have failed in that case."
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> s390x/css.c | 36 ++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
(...)
> @@ -336,8 +316,6 @@ static struct {
> void (*func)(void);
> } tests[] = {
> /* The css_init test is needed to initialize the CSS Characteristics */
If you remove the css_init test from this list, the above comment does
not make sense anymore :)
> - { "initialize CSS (chsc)", css_init },
> - { "enumerate (stsch)", test_enumerate },
> { "enable (msch)", test_enable },
> { "sense (ssch/tsch)", test_sense },
> { "measurement block (schm)", test_schm },
> @@ -352,11 +330,25 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>
> report_prefix_push("Channel Subsystem");
> enable_io_isc(0x80 >> IO_SCH_ISC);
> +
> + report_prefix_push("initialize CSS (chsc)");
> + css_init();
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + report_prefix_push("enumerate (stsch)");
> + test_enumerate();
> + report_prefix_pop();
Could we maybe have two lists of tests: one that don't require a
device, and one that does?
> +
> + if (!test_device_sid)
> + goto end;
In any case, I think we should log an explicit message that we skip the
remaining tests because of no device being available.
> +
> for (i = 0; tests[i].name; i++) {
> report_prefix_push(tests[i].name);
> tests[i].func();
> report_prefix_pop();
> }
> +
> +end:
> report_prefix_pop();
>
> return report_summary();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-06 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-06 7:40 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 00/16] s390x: Testing SSCH, CSCH and HSCH for errors Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 01/16] s390x: lib: css: disabling a subchannel Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 02/16] s390x: lib: css: SCSW bit definitions Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 03/16] s390x: css: simplify skipping tests on no device Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 12:44 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-04-07 10:53 ` Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 04/16] s390x: lib: css: separate wait for IRQ and check I/O completion Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 05/16] s390x: lib: css: add SCSW ctrl expectations to " Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 06/16] s390x: lib: css: checking I/O errors Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 07/16] s390x: css: testing ssch errors Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 08/16] s390x: css: ssch check for cpa zero Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 09/16] s390x: css: ssch with mis aligned ORB Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 10/16] s390x: css: ssch checking addressing errors Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 11/16] s390x: css: No support for MIDAW Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 15:58 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-07 10:06 ` Pierre Morel
2021-04-07 10:14 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 12/16] s390x: css: Check ORB reserved bits Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 15:51 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-07 10:07 ` Pierre Morel
2021-04-07 10:15 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 13/16] s390x: css: checking for CSS extensions Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 15:50 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-07 10:42 ` Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 14/16] s390x: css: issuing SSCH when the channel is status pending Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 15:34 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-04-07 10:46 ` Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 15/16] s390x: css: testing halt subchannel Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 7:40 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 16/16] s390x: css: testing clear subchannel Pierre Morel
2021-04-06 12:21 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 00/16] s390x: Testing SSCH, CSCH and HSCH for errors Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210406144405.09647bb4.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.