diff for duplicates of <20210408114113.GN7405@nvidia.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index c224e18..c01e952 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 11:50:02PM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote: -> > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> +> > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 8:21 PM > > > > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 02:08:33AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote: @@ -52,8 +52,12 @@ not doing Intel's job for free. > Don't people accept any balance between enabling new features and > completing refactoring work through a staging approach, as long as -> we don't introduce an uAPI specifically for the staging purpose? ☹ +> we don't introduce an uAPI specifically for the staging purpose? ☹ Since this is all uapi I don't see it as applicable here. Jason +_______________________________________________ +iommu mailing list +iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org +https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 7cd33c9..24fbb95 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -8,34 +8,33 @@ "ref\0MWHPR11MB1886CB8F558C6C17F921F77F8C759@MWHPR11MB1886.namprd11.prod.outlook.com\0" "ref\020210407122042.GF7405@nvidia.com\0" "ref\0MWHPR11MB1886AEAE97A9E6972C63CACF8C759@MWHPR11MB1886.namprd11.prod.outlook.com\0" - "ref\0MWHPR11MB1886AEAE97A9E6972C63CACF8C759-4Pk8um7sDhPjKiA5vsxACZPPoyLQLiKMvxpqHgZTriW3zl9H0oFU5g@public.gmane.org\0" - "From\0Jason Gunthorpe <jgg-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\0" + "From\0Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH V4 05/18] iommu/ioasid: Redefine IOASID set and allocation APIs\0" "Date\0Thu, 8 Apr 2021 08:41:13 -0300\0" "To\0Tian" - " Kevin <kevin.tian-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Cc\0Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>" - Alex Williamson <alex.williamson-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> - Raj - Ashok <ashok.raj-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> - Jonathan Corbet <corbet-T1hC0tSOHrs@public.gmane.org> - Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe-68IGFXMjmZ7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> - LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org> + " Kevin <kevin.tian@intel.com>\0" + "Cc\0Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>" Jiang - Dave <dave.jiang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> - iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org <iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org> - Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> - Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org> - Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> - cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org <cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org> + Dave <dave.jiang@intel.com> + Raj + Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com> + Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> + David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> + Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> + LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> + iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org> + Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> + Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com> + Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> + Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> + cgroups@vger.kernel.org <cgroups@vger.kernel.org> + Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.com> Wu - Hao <hao.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> - David Woodhouse <dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org> - " Jason Wang <jasowang-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\0" + " Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 11:50:02PM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:\n" - "> > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\n" + "> > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>\n" "> > Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 8:21 PM\n" "> > \n" "> > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 02:08:33AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:\n" @@ -88,10 +87,14 @@ "\n" "> Don't people accept any balance between enabling new features and\n" "> completing refactoring work through a staging approach, as long as\n" - "> we don't introduce an uAPI specifically for the staging purpose? \303\242\313\234\302\271\n" + "> we don't introduce an uAPI specifically for the staging purpose? \342\230\271\n" "\n" "Since this is all uapi I don't see it as applicable here.\n" "\n" - Jason + "Jason\n" + "_______________________________________________\n" + "iommu mailing list\n" + "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org\n" + https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu -5c1b5a2093c259f9df4a6b1bd10537c3be300faa41d1cbef6d277c56d35a56da +b5501429aa99c4691e6c5f2fd41826cae135c0ea33e0bb2dbd0a294992e599fe
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index c224e18..23bc071 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 11:50:02PM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote: -> > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> +> > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 8:21 PM > > > > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 02:08:33AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote: @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ not doing Intel's job for free. > Don't people accept any balance between enabling new features and > completing refactoring work through a staging approach, as long as -> we don't introduce an uAPI specifically for the staging purpose? ☹ +> we don't introduce an uAPI specifically for the staging purpose? ☹ Since this is all uapi I don't see it as applicable here. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 7cd33c9..22858be 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -8,34 +8,33 @@ "ref\0MWHPR11MB1886CB8F558C6C17F921F77F8C759@MWHPR11MB1886.namprd11.prod.outlook.com\0" "ref\020210407122042.GF7405@nvidia.com\0" "ref\0MWHPR11MB1886AEAE97A9E6972C63CACF8C759@MWHPR11MB1886.namprd11.prod.outlook.com\0" - "ref\0MWHPR11MB1886AEAE97A9E6972C63CACF8C759-4Pk8um7sDhPjKiA5vsxACZPPoyLQLiKMvxpqHgZTriW3zl9H0oFU5g@public.gmane.org\0" - "From\0Jason Gunthorpe <jgg-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\0" + "From\0Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH V4 05/18] iommu/ioasid: Redefine IOASID set and allocation APIs\0" "Date\0Thu, 8 Apr 2021 08:41:13 -0300\0" "To\0Tian" - " Kevin <kevin.tian-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Cc\0Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>" - Alex Williamson <alex.williamson-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> + " Kevin <kevin.tian@intel.com>\0" + "Cc\0Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>" + Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> Raj - Ashok <ashok.raj-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> - Jonathan Corbet <corbet-T1hC0tSOHrs@public.gmane.org> - Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe-68IGFXMjmZ7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> - LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org> + Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com> + Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> + Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.com> + LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Jiang - Dave <dave.jiang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> - iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org <iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org> - Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> - Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org> - Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> - cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org <cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org> + Dave <dave.jiang@intel.com> + iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org> + Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com> + Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> + Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> + cgroups@vger.kernel.org <cgroups@vger.kernel.org> Wu - Hao <hao.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> - David Woodhouse <dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org> - " Jason Wang <jasowang-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\0" + Hao <hao.wu@intel.com> + David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> + " Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 11:50:02PM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:\n" - "> > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\n" + "> > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>\n" "> > Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 8:21 PM\n" "> > \n" "> > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 02:08:33AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:\n" @@ -88,10 +87,10 @@ "\n" "> Don't people accept any balance between enabling new features and\n" "> completing refactoring work through a staging approach, as long as\n" - "> we don't introduce an uAPI specifically for the staging purpose? \303\242\313\234\302\271\n" + "> we don't introduce an uAPI specifically for the staging purpose? \342\230\271\n" "\n" "Since this is all uapi I don't see it as applicable here.\n" "\n" Jason -5c1b5a2093c259f9df4a6b1bd10537c3be300faa41d1cbef6d277c56d35a56da +73b8406a8df6dc47b09ce1f49dc1319661a3d7bac1b5c97d1228e0a93dce6ff4
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.