From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] tracing/hwlat: Implement the per-cpu mode
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 05:39:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202104090545.du72PBvJ-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c99ca2d7403474508aa7b025869c0673238400a.1617889883.git.bristot@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7539 bytes --]
Hi Daniel,
[FYI, it's a private test report for your RFC patch.]
[auto build test WARNING on tip/perf/core]
[also build test WARNING on linux/master linus/master v5.12-rc6]
[cannot apply to trace/for-next next-20210408]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Bristot-de-Oliveira/hwlat-improvements-and-osnoise-tracer/20210408-221655
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git cface0326a6c2ae5c8f47bd466f07624b3e348a7
config: openrisc-randconfig-r013-20210408 (attached as .config)
compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/4e2f5d30c69f77756e8cf223acf55c2aa2657393
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Daniel-Bristot-de-Oliveira/hwlat-improvements-and-osnoise-tracer/20210408-221655
git checkout 4e2f5d30c69f77756e8cf223acf55c2aa2657393
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=openrisc
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:122:28: warning: no previous prototype for 'get_cpu_data' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
122 | struct hwlat_kthread_data *get_cpu_data(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/err.h:5,
from include/linux/kthread.h:5,
from kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:40:
kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c: In function 'start_per_cpu_kthreads':
kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:496:25: error: passing argument 1 of 'alloc_cpumask_var' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
496 | if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&this_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| struct cpumask **
include/linux/compiler.h:58:52: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if_var'
58 | #define __trace_if_var(cond) (__builtin_constant_p(cond) ? (cond) : __trace_if_value(cond))
| ^~~~
kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:496:2: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
496 | if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&this_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL))
| ^~
In file included from include/linux/smp.h:13,
from include/linux/lockdep.h:14,
from include/linux/rcupdate.h:29,
from include/linux/rculist.h:11,
from include/linux/pid.h:5,
from include/linux/sched.h:14,
from include/linux/kthread.h:6,
from kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:40:
include/linux/cpumask.h:767:53: note: expected 'struct cpumask (*)[1]' but argument is of type 'struct cpumask **'
767 | static inline bool alloc_cpumask_var(cpumask_var_t *mask, gfp_t flags)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
In file included from include/linux/err.h:5,
from include/linux/kthread.h:5,
from kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:40:
kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:496:25: error: passing argument 1 of 'alloc_cpumask_var' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
496 | if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&this_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| struct cpumask **
include/linux/compiler.h:58:61: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if_var'
58 | #define __trace_if_var(cond) (__builtin_constant_p(cond) ? (cond) : __trace_if_value(cond))
| ^~~~
kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:496:2: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
496 | if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&this_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL))
| ^~
In file included from include/linux/smp.h:13,
from include/linux/lockdep.h:14,
from include/linux/rcupdate.h:29,
from include/linux/rculist.h:11,
from include/linux/pid.h:5,
from include/linux/sched.h:14,
from include/linux/kthread.h:6,
from kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:40:
include/linux/cpumask.h:767:53: note: expected 'struct cpumask (*)[1]' but argument is of type 'struct cpumask **'
767 | static inline bool alloc_cpumask_var(cpumask_var_t *mask, gfp_t flags)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
In file included from include/linux/err.h:5,
from include/linux/kthread.h:5,
from kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:40:
kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:496:25: error: passing argument 1 of 'alloc_cpumask_var' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
496 | if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&this_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| struct cpumask **
include/linux/compiler.h:69:3: note: in definition of macro '__trace_if_value'
69 | (cond) ? \
| ^~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:56:28: note: in expansion of macro '__trace_if_var'
56 | #define if(cond, ...) if ( __trace_if_var( !!(cond , ## __VA_ARGS__) ) )
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:496:2: note: in expansion of macro 'if'
496 | if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&this_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL))
| ^~
In file included from include/linux/smp.h:13,
from include/linux/lockdep.h:14,
from include/linux/rcupdate.h:29,
from include/linux/rculist.h:11,
from include/linux/pid.h:5,
from include/linux/sched.h:14,
from include/linux/kthread.h:6,
from kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:40:
include/linux/cpumask.h:767:53: note: expected 'struct cpumask (*)[1]' but argument is of type 'struct cpumask **'
767 | static inline bool alloc_cpumask_var(cpumask_var_t *mask, gfp_t flags)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c: In function 'hwlat_mode_write':
kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:800:6: warning: variable 'ret' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
800 | int ret;
| ^~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/get_cpu_data +122 kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
121
> 122 struct hwlat_kthread_data *get_cpu_data(void)
123 {
124 if (hwlat_data.thread_mode == MODE_PER_CPU)
125 return this_cpu_ptr(&hwlat_per_cpu_data);
126 else
127 return &hwlat_single_cpu_data;
128 }
129
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 25278 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-08 21:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-08 14:13 [RFC PATCH 0/5] hwlat improvements and osnoise tracer Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2021-04-08 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] tracing/hwlat: Add a cpus file specific for hwlat_detector Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2021-04-14 14:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-15 13:09 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2021-04-15 13:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-15 14:33 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2021-04-08 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] tracing/hwlat: Implement the mode config option Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2021-04-08 20:52 ` kernel test robot
2021-04-14 14:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-15 13:16 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2021-04-15 13:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-08 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] tracing/hwlat: Implement the per-cpu mode Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2021-04-08 19:39 ` kernel test robot
2021-04-08 21:39 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2021-04-08 23:54 ` kernel test robot
2021-04-14 14:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-15 13:22 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2021-04-15 15:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-08 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] tracing: Add __print_ns_to_secs() and __print_ns_without_secs() helpers Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2021-04-08 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] tracing: Add the osnoise tracer Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2021-04-08 15:58 ` Jonathan Corbet
2021-04-09 7:19 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2021-04-08 23:57 ` kernel test robot
2021-04-14 17:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-04-15 13:43 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202104090545.du72PBvJ-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.