All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/7] mm,hugetlb: Clear HPageFreed outside of the lock
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 12:49:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210414104953.GF20886@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YHbE2q/Otrdx1cgK@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:32:58PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Well, to be precise it does the very same thing with memamp struct pages
> but that is before the initialization code you have pointed out above.
> In this context it just poisons the allocated content which is the GB
> page storage.

Right.

> > I checked, and when we get there in __alloc_bootmem_huge_page, page->private is
> > still zeroed, so I guess it should be safe to assume that we do not really need
> > to clear the flag in __prep_new_huge_page() routine?
> 
> It would be quite nasty if the struct pages content would be undefined.
> Maybe that is possible but then I would rather stick the initialization
> into __alloc_bootmem_huge_page.

Yes, but I do not think that is really possible unless I missed something.
Let us see what Mike thinks of it, if there are no objections, we can
get rid of the clearing flag right there.
 

-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-14 10:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-13 10:47 [PATCH v7 0/7] Make alloc_contig_range handle Hugetlb pages Oscar Salvador
2021-04-13 10:47 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] mm,page_alloc: Bail out earlier on -ENOMEM in alloc_contig_migrate_range Oscar Salvador
2021-04-13 17:00   ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-13 10:47 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] mm,compaction: Let isolate_migratepages_{range,block} return error codes Oscar Salvador
2021-04-13 17:52   ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-14 11:54   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-15  8:42     ` Oscar Salvador
2021-04-13 10:47 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] mm,hugetlb: Clear HPageFreed outside of the lock Oscar Salvador
2021-04-13 13:23   ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-13 21:19     ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-14  6:04       ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-14  7:41         ` Oscar Salvador
2021-04-14  8:28           ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-14 10:01             ` Oscar Salvador
2021-04-14 10:03               ` Oscar Salvador
2021-04-14 10:32               ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-14 10:49                 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2021-04-14 11:09                   ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-14 12:02                     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-14 16:45                   ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-13 10:47 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] mm,hugetlb: Split prep_new_huge_page functionality Oscar Salvador
2021-04-13 13:24   ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-13 13:26     ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-13 21:33   ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-14  4:59     ` Oscar Salvador
2021-04-14 12:15       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-14 17:03       ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-13 10:47 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] mm: Make alloc_contig_range handle free hugetlb pages Oscar Salvador
2021-04-13 13:40   ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-15  8:29     ` Oscar Salvador
2021-04-13 22:29   ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-14  4:54     ` Oscar Salvador
2021-04-14 12:26   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-15  8:28     ` Oscar Salvador
2021-04-13 10:47 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] mm: Make alloc_contig_range handle in-use " Oscar Salvador
2021-04-13 22:48   ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-14  4:52     ` Oscar Salvador
2021-04-14 17:07       ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-13 10:47 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] mm,page_alloc: Drop unnecessary checks from pfn_range_valid_contig Oscar Salvador
2021-04-13 22:53   ` Mike Kravetz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210414104953.GF20886@linux \
    --to=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.