From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 20:35:17 +0200 From: Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: ipipe 5.4.107 / 5.4.93 build issues on arm32 Message-ID: <20210414203517.772ea33c@windsurf.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20210414144235.6e9d83cd@windsurf.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Hello, On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 15:49:45 +0200 Jan Kiszka wrote: > Does > https://source.denx.de/Xenomai/xenomai/-/commit/18ab00b7b0c2c2d0ed1f560cf= 4fb4161f6e9bde6 > help? Or did you build a tree that included this? This helps, but the build fails a bit later with: In file included from kernel/cpu.c:23:0: ./include/linux/stop_machine.h: In function =E2=80=98stop_machine_cpuslocke= d=E2=80=99: ./include/linux/stop_machine.h:150:2: error: implicit declaration of functi= on =E2=80=98hard_irq_enable=E2=80=99; did you mean =E2=80=98hard_irq_disabl= e=E2=80=99? [-Werror=3Dimplicit-function-declaration] hard_irq_enable(); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ hard_irq_disable But this makes me realize something: I am using Xenomai 3.1, together with the ipipe patch https://xenomai.org/downloads/ipipe/v5.x/arm/ipipe-core-5.4.107-arm-1.patch. Maybe this doesn't make any sense, and this very recent ipipe patch is only compatible with a more recent version of Xenomai ? Thomas --=20 Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com