From: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
shuah@kernel.org
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v8] fat: Add KUnit tests for checksums and timestamps
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 23:56:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210416065623.882364-1-davidgow@google.com> (raw)
Add some basic sanity-check tests for the fat_checksum() function and
the fat_time_unix2fat() and fat_time_fat2unix() functions. These unit
tests verify these functions return correct output for a number of test
inputs.
These tests were inspored by -- and serve a similar purpose to -- the
timestamp parsing KUnit tests in ext4[1].
Note that, unlike fat_time_unix2fat, fat_time_fat2unix wasn't previously
exported, so this patch exports it as well. This is required for the
case where we're building the fat and fat_test as modules.
[1]:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/fs/ext4/inode-test.c
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
---
It's been a while, but this hopefully is a final version of the FAT KUnit
patchset. It has a number of changes to keep it up-to-date with current
KUnit standards, notably the use of parameterised tests and the addition
of a '.kunitconfig' file to allow for easy testing. It also fixes an
endianness tagging issue picked up by the kernel test robot under sparse
on pa-risc.
Cheers,
-- David
Changes since v7:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201028064631.3774908-1-davidgow@google.com/
- Make the two timestamp tests parameterised: this means that the KUnit
runtime and tooling are aware of the different testcases (and print a
nice list of them to the TAP log when the test is run).
- Fix some issues sparse picked up with __le32 tagged integers.
- Add an fs/fat/.kunitconfig file which contains all the Kconfig entries
needed to run the test. The test can now be run with:
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig fs/fat/.kunitconfig
Changes since v6:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201024060558.2556249-1-davidgow@google.com/
- Make CONFIG_FAT_DEFAULT_CODEPAGE depend on FAT_FS, rather than either
VFAT_FS or MSDOS_FS.
- This means that FAT_KUNIT_TEST can now also just depend of FAT_FS
- Fix a few warnings that KUnit tool was eating:
- KUnit's type checking needs a specific cast for the fat_checksum()
expected results.
- The time test cases shouldn't be 'const'
- The fake superblock is now static, as otherwise it increased the
stack size too much.
Changes since v4/5:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201024052047.2526780-1-davidgow@google.com/
- Fix a typo introduced in the Kconfig. It builds now.
Changes since v3:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201021061713.1545931-1-davidgow@google.com/
- Update the Kconfig entry to use "depends on" rather than "select", as
discussed in [2].
- Depend on "MSDOS_FS || VFAT_FS", rather than "FAT_FS", as we need the
CONFIG_FAT_DEFAULT_CODEPAGE symbol to be defined.
Changes since v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201020055856.1270482-1-davidgow@google.com/
- Comment that the export for fat_time_fat2unix() function is for KUnit
tests.
Changes since v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201017064107.375174-1-davidgow@google.com/
- Now export fat_time_fat2unix() so that the test can access it when
built as a module.
[2]:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/52959e99-4105-3de9-730c-c46894b82bdd@infradead.org/T/#t
fs/fat/.kunitconfig | 5 ++
fs/fat/Kconfig | 14 +++-
fs/fat/Makefile | 2 +
fs/fat/fat_test.c | 197 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/fat/misc.c | 2 +
5 files changed, 219 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 fs/fat/.kunitconfig
create mode 100644 fs/fat/fat_test.c
diff --git a/fs/fat/.kunitconfig b/fs/fat/.kunitconfig
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0a6971dbeccb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/fs/fat/.kunitconfig
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+CONFIG_KUNIT=y
+CONFIG_FAT_FS=y
+CONFIG_MSDOS_FS=y
+CONFIG_VFAT_FS=y
+CONFIG_FAT_KUNIT_TEST=y
diff --git a/fs/fat/Kconfig b/fs/fat/Kconfig
index 66532a71e8fd..238cc55f84c4 100644
--- a/fs/fat/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/fat/Kconfig
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ config VFAT_FS
config FAT_DEFAULT_CODEPAGE
int "Default codepage for FAT"
- depends on MSDOS_FS || VFAT_FS
+ depends on FAT_FS
default 437
help
This option should be set to the codepage of your FAT filesystems.
@@ -115,3 +115,15 @@ config FAT_DEFAULT_UTF8
Say Y if you use UTF-8 encoding for file names, N otherwise.
See <file:Documentation/filesystems/vfat.rst> for more information.
+
+config FAT_KUNIT_TEST
+ tristate "Unit Tests for FAT filesystems" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+ depends on KUNIT && FAT_FS
+ default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+ help
+ This builds the FAT KUnit tests
+
+ For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general, please refer
+ to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit
+
+ If unsure, say N
diff --git a/fs/fat/Makefile b/fs/fat/Makefile
index 70645ce2f7fc..2b034112690d 100644
--- a/fs/fat/Makefile
+++ b/fs/fat/Makefile
@@ -10,3 +10,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MSDOS_FS) += msdos.o
fat-y := cache.o dir.o fatent.o file.o inode.o misc.o nfs.o
vfat-y := namei_vfat.o
msdos-y := namei_msdos.o
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_FAT_KUNIT_TEST) += fat_test.o
diff --git a/fs/fat/fat_test.c b/fs/fat/fat_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..febd25f57d4b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/fs/fat/fat_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * KUnit tests for FAT filesystems.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2020 Google LLC.
+ * Author: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
+ */
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+
+#include "fat.h"
+
+static void fat_checksum_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ /* With no extension. */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fat_checksum("VMLINUX "), (u8)44);
+ /* With 3-letter extension. */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fat_checksum("README TXT"), (u8)115);
+ /* With short (1-letter) extension. */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fat_checksum("ABCDEFGHA "), (u8)98);
+}
+
+
+struct fat_timestamp_testcase {
+ const char *name;
+ struct timespec64 ts;
+ __le16 time;
+ __le16 date;
+ u8 cs;
+ int time_offset;
+};
+
+static struct fat_timestamp_testcase time_test_cases[] = {
+ {
+ .name = "Earliest possible UTC (1980-01-01 00:00:00)",
+ .ts = {.tv_sec = 315532800LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ .time = cpu_to_le16(0),
+ .date = cpu_to_le16(33),
+ .cs = 0,
+ .time_offset = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "Latest possible UTC (2107-12-31 23:59:58)",
+ .ts = {.tv_sec = 4354819198LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ .time = cpu_to_le16(49021),
+ .date = cpu_to_le16(65439),
+ .cs = 0,
+ .time_offset = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "Earliest possible (UTC-11) (== 1979-12-31 13:00:00 UTC)",
+ .ts = {.tv_sec = 315493200LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ .time = cpu_to_le16(0),
+ .date = cpu_to_le16(33),
+ .cs = 0,
+ .time_offset = 11 * 60,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "Latest possible (UTC+11) (== 2108-01-01 10:59:58 UTC)",
+ .ts = {.tv_sec = 4354858798LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ .time = cpu_to_le16(49021),
+ .date = cpu_to_le16(65439),
+ .cs = 0,
+ .time_offset = -11 * 60,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "Leap Day / Year (1996-02-29 00:00:00)",
+ .ts = {.tv_sec = 825552000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ .time = cpu_to_le16(0),
+ .date = cpu_to_le16(8285),
+ .cs = 0,
+ .time_offset = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "Year 2000 is leap year (2000-02-29 00:00:00)",
+ .ts = {.tv_sec = 951782400LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ .time = cpu_to_le16(0),
+ .date = cpu_to_le16(10333),
+ .cs = 0,
+ .time_offset = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "Year 2100 not leap year (2100-03-01 00:00:00)",
+ .ts = {.tv_sec = 4107542400LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ .time = cpu_to_le16(0),
+ .date = cpu_to_le16(61537),
+ .cs = 0,
+ .time_offset = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "Leap year + timezone UTC+1 (== 2004-02-29 00:30:00 UTC)",
+ .ts = {.tv_sec = 1078014600LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ .time = cpu_to_le16(48064),
+ .date = cpu_to_le16(12380),
+ .cs = 0,
+ .time_offset = -60,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "Leap year + timezone UTC-1 (== 2004-02-29 23:30:00 UTC)",
+ .ts = {.tv_sec = 1078097400LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ .time = cpu_to_le16(960),
+ .date = cpu_to_le16(12385),
+ .cs = 0,
+ .time_offset = 60,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "VFAT odd-second resolution (1999-12-31 23:59:59)",
+ .ts = {.tv_sec = 946684799LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
+ .time = cpu_to_le16(49021),
+ .date = cpu_to_le16(10143),
+ .cs = 100,
+ .time_offset = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "VFAT 10ms resolution (1980-01-01 00:00:00:0010)",
+ .ts = {.tv_sec = 315532800LL, .tv_nsec = 10000000L},
+ .time = cpu_to_le16(0),
+ .date = cpu_to_le16(33),
+ .cs = 1,
+ .time_offset = 0,
+ },
+};
+
+static void time_testcase_desc(struct fat_timestamp_testcase *t,
+ char *desc)
+{
+ strscpy(desc, t->name, KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE);
+}
+
+KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(fat_time, time_test_cases, time_testcase_desc);
+
+static void fat_time_fat2unix_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ static struct msdos_sb_info fake_sb;
+ struct timespec64 ts;
+ struct fat_timestamp_testcase *testcase =
+ (struct fat_timestamp_testcase *)test->param_value;
+
+ fake_sb.options.tz_set = 1;
+ fake_sb.options.time_offset = testcase->time_offset;
+
+ fat_time_fat2unix(&fake_sb, &ts,
+ testcase->time,
+ testcase->date,
+ testcase->cs);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
+ testcase->ts.tv_sec,
+ ts.tv_sec,
+ "Timestamp mismatch (seconds)\n");
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
+ testcase->ts.tv_nsec,
+ ts.tv_nsec,
+ "Timestamp mismatch (nanoseconds)\n");
+}
+
+static void fat_time_unix2fat_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ static struct msdos_sb_info fake_sb;
+ __le16 date, time;
+ u8 cs;
+ struct fat_timestamp_testcase *testcase =
+ (struct fat_timestamp_testcase *)test->param_value;
+
+ fake_sb.options.tz_set = 1;
+ fake_sb.options.time_offset = testcase->time_offset;
+
+ fat_time_unix2fat(&fake_sb, &(testcase->ts),
+ &time, &date, &cs);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
+ le16_to_cpu(testcase->time),
+ le16_to_cpu(time),
+ "Time mismatch\n");
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
+ le16_to_cpu(testcase->date),
+ le16_to_cpu(date),
+ "Date mismatch\n");
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
+ testcase->cs,
+ cs,
+ "Centisecond mismatch\n");
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case fat_test_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(fat_checksum_test),
+ KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(fat_time_fat2unix_test, fat_time_gen_params),
+ KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(fat_time_unix2fat_test, fat_time_gen_params),
+ {},
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite fat_test_suite = {
+ .name = "fat_test",
+ .test_cases = fat_test_cases,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suites(&fat_test_suite);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
diff --git a/fs/fat/misc.c b/fs/fat/misc.c
index 18a50a46b57f..9073fa927be3 100644
--- a/fs/fat/misc.c
+++ b/fs/fat/misc.c
@@ -229,6 +229,8 @@ void fat_time_fat2unix(struct msdos_sb_info *sbi, struct timespec64 *ts,
ts->tv_nsec = 0;
}
}
+/* Export fat_time_fat2unix() for the fat_test KUnit tests. */
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fat_time_fat2unix);
/* Convert linear UNIX date to a FAT time/date pair. */
void fat_time_unix2fat(struct msdos_sb_info *sbi, struct timespec64 *ts,
--
2.31.1.368.gbe11c130af-goog
next reply other threads:[~2021-04-16 6:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-16 6:56 David Gow [this message]
2021-05-04 18:36 ` [PATCH v8] fat: Add KUnit tests for checksums and timestamps Brendan Higgins
2021-05-05 6:48 ` David Gow
2021-05-05 17:44 ` Brendan Higgins
2021-05-05 22:22 ` Daniel Latypov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210416065623.882364-1-davidgow@google.com \
--to=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.