From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>
Cc: Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
Bob Pearson <rpearson@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next v2 9/9] RDMA/rxe: Implement memory access through MWs
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:04:02 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210420120402.GY1370958@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=hENfnffpYsxVNFUXDEedcGJ5oq3x-SrhKT23Y=6wiYYa3Tg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 02:34:07PM +0800, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.h b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.h
> > index b286a14ec282..9f35e2c042d0 100644
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.h
> > @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ struct rxe_resp_info {
> >
> > /* RDMA read / atomic only */
> > u64 va;
> > + u64 offset;
> > struct rxe_mr *mr;
> > u32 resid;
> > u32 rkey;
> > @@ -470,6 +471,16 @@ static inline u32 mr_rkey(struct rxe_mr *mr)
> > return mr->ibmr.rkey;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline struct rxe_pd *mw_pd(struct rxe_mw *mw)
>
> inline
> Can we remove inline keyword and let the compile to decide it?
Not in a header
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-20 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-15 2:54 [PATCH for-next v2 0/9] RDMA/rxe: Implement memory windows Bob Pearson
2021-04-15 2:54 ` [PATCH for-next v2 1/9] RDMA/rxe: Add bind MW fields to rxe_send_wr Bob Pearson
2021-04-15 2:54 ` [PATCH for-next v2 2/9] RDMA/rxe: Return errors for add index and key Bob Pearson
2021-04-15 2:54 ` [PATCH for-next v2 3/9] RDMA/rxe: Enable MW object pool Bob Pearson
2021-04-15 2:54 ` [PATCH for-next v2 4/9] RDMA/rxe: Add ib_alloc_mw and ib_dealloc_mw verbs Bob Pearson
2021-04-15 2:54 ` [PATCH for-next v2 5/9] RDMA/rxe: Replace WR_REG_MASK by WR_LOCAL_OP_MASK Bob Pearson
2021-04-15 2:54 ` [PATCH for-next v2 6/9] RDMA/rxe: Move local ops to subroutine Bob Pearson
2021-04-15 2:54 ` [PATCH for-next v2 7/9] RDMA/rxe: Add support for bind MW work requests Bob Pearson
2021-04-20 14:32 ` Zhu Yanjun
2021-04-21 4:24 ` Bob Pearson
2021-04-15 2:54 ` [PATCH for-next v2 8/9] RDMA/rxe: Implement invalidate MW operations Bob Pearson
2021-04-20 6:38 ` Zhu Yanjun
2021-04-21 4:22 ` Bob Pearson
2021-04-15 2:54 ` [PATCH for-next v2 9/9] RDMA/rxe: Implement memory access through MWs Bob Pearson
2021-04-20 6:34 ` Zhu Yanjun
2021-04-20 12:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-04-21 4:09 ` Bob Pearson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210420120402.GY1370958@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpearson@hpe.com \
--cc=rpearsonhpe@gmail.com \
--cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.