All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	kuba@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	song@kernel.org, toke@redhat.com, brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next] cpumap: bulk skb using netif_receive_skb_list
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 18:54:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210420185440.1dfcf71c@carbon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01cd8afa22786b2c8a4cd7250d165741e990a771.1618927173.git.lorenzo@kernel.org>

On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 16:05:14 +0200
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> wrote:

> Rely on netif_receive_skb_list routine to send skbs converted from
> xdp_frames in cpu_map_kthread_run in order to improve i-cache usage.
> The proposed patch has been tested running xdp_redirect_cpu bpf sample
> available in the kernel tree that is used to redirect UDP frames from
> ixgbe driver to a cpumap entry and then to the networking stack.
> UDP frames are generated using pkt_gen. Packets are discarded by the
> UDP layer.
> 
> $xdp_redirect_cpu  --cpu <cpu> --progname xdp_cpu_map0 --dev <eth>
> 
> bpf-next: ~2.35Mpps
> bpf-next + cpumap skb-list: ~2.72Mpps
> 
> Since netif_receive_skb_list does not return number of discarded packets,
> remove drop counter from xdp_cpumap_kthread tracepoint and update related
> xdp samples.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> - remove drop counter and update related xdp samples
> - rebased on top of bpf-next
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - fixed comment
> - rebased on top of bpf-next tree
> ---
>  include/trace/events/xdp.h          | 14 +++++---------
>  kernel/bpf/cpumap.c                 | 16 +++++++---------
>  samples/bpf/xdp_monitor_kern.c      |  6 ++----
>  samples/bpf/xdp_monitor_user.c      | 14 ++++++--------
>  samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_cpu_kern.c | 12 +++++-------
>  samples/bpf/xdp_redirect_cpu_user.c | 10 ++++------
>  6 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/xdp.h b/include/trace/events/xdp.h
> index fcad3645a70b..52ecfe9c7e25 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/xdp.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/xdp.h
> @@ -184,16 +184,15 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(xdp_redirect_template, xdp_redirect_map_err,
>  
>  TRACE_EVENT(xdp_cpumap_kthread,
>  
> -	TP_PROTO(int map_id, unsigned int processed,  unsigned int drops,
> -		 int sched, struct xdp_cpumap_stats *xdp_stats),
> +	TP_PROTO(int map_id, unsigned int processed, int sched,
> +		 struct xdp_cpumap_stats *xdp_stats),
>  
> -	TP_ARGS(map_id, processed, drops, sched, xdp_stats),
> +	TP_ARGS(map_id, processed, sched, xdp_stats),
>  
>  	TP_STRUCT__entry(
>  		__field(int, map_id)
>  		__field(u32, act)
>  		__field(int, cpu)
> -		__field(unsigned int, drops)
>  		__field(unsigned int, processed)

So, struct member @processed will takeover the room for @drops.

Can you please test how an old xdp_monitor program will react to this?
Will it fail, or extract and show wrong values?

The xdp_mointor tool is in several external git repos:

 https://github.com/netoptimizer/prototype-kernel/blob/master/kernel/samples/bpf/xdp_monitor_kern.c
 https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-tutorial/tree/master/tracing02-xdp-monitor

Do you have any plans for fixing those tools?


>  		__field(int, sched)
>  		__field(unsigned int, xdp_pass)
> @@ -205,7 +204,6 @@ TRACE_EVENT(xdp_cpumap_kthread,
>  		__entry->map_id		= map_id;
>  		__entry->act		= XDP_REDIRECT;
>  		__entry->cpu		= smp_processor_id();
> -		__entry->drops		= drops;
>  		__entry->processed	= processed;
>  		__entry->sched	= sched;
>  		__entry->xdp_pass	= xdp_stats->pass;
> @@ -215,13 +213,11 @@ TRACE_EVENT(xdp_cpumap_kthread,
>  
>  	TP_printk("kthread"
>  		  " cpu=%d map_id=%d action=%s"
> -		  " processed=%u drops=%u"
> -		  " sched=%d"
> +		  " processed=%u sched=%u"
>  		  " xdp_pass=%u xdp_drop=%u xdp_redirect=%u",
>  		  __entry->cpu, __entry->map_id,
>  		  __print_symbolic(__entry->act, __XDP_ACT_SYM_TAB),
> -		  __entry->processed, __entry->drops,
> -		  __entry->sched,
> +		  __entry->processed, __entry->sched,
>  		  __entry->xdp_pass, __entry->xdp_drop, __entry->xdp_redirect)
>  );



-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-20 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-20 14:05 [PATCH v3 bpf-next] cpumap: bulk skb using netif_receive_skb_list Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-20 16:54 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2021-04-20 17:09   ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-22 10:59     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-22 12:30       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210420185440.1dfcf71c@carbon \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.