Re: [PATCH 2/5] git-completion.bash: rename to $__git_cmd_idx

["SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 01:50:19PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > In e94fb44042 (git-completion.bash: pass $__git_subcommand_idx from
> > __git_main(), 2021-03-24), the $__git_subcommand_idx variable was
> > introduced. Naming it after the index of the subcommand is flat-out
> > wrong as this variable really holds the index of the git comand (e.g.
> 
> comand -> command
> 
> > "stash").
> >
> > Rename this variable so that it's obvious it's about git commands. While
> > we're at it, shorten up its name so that it's still readable without
> > being a handful to type.
> 
> As the patch has already written, I won't complain too much, but to
> many people "git" is a command and "add", "commit" etc. are
> subcommands of "git", so I do not see git_subcommand_idx so wrong
> that it needs to be renamed.  I do understand that it is a bit too
> long and it may be easier to type if renamed to say git_cmd_idx,
> though ;-)

The completion functions for git commands having subcommands usually
start like this:

    _git_remote ()
    {
        local subcommands="
                add rename remove set-head set-branches
                get-url set-url show prune update
                "
        local subcommand="$(__git_find_on_cmdline "$subcommands")"
        if [ -z "$subcommand" ]; then

__git_subcommand_idx holds the index of the word "remote", not the
index of "add/rename/etc.", so in the context of the completion script
that name is misleading.