From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@huawei.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/8] tick/nohz: Only wakeup a single target cpu when kicking a task
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:01:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210422120158.33629-7-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210422120158.33629-1-frederic@kernel.org>
When adding a tick dependency to a task, its necessary to
wakeup the CPU where the task resides to reevaluate tick
dependencies on that CPU.
However the current code wakes up all nohz_full CPUs, which
is unnecessary.
Switch to waking up a single CPU, by using ordering of writes
to task->cpu and task->tick_dep_mask.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@huawei.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
---
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index ffc13b9dfbe3..45d9a4ea3ee0 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -322,6 +322,31 @@ void tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(int cpu)
irq_work_queue_on(&per_cpu(nohz_full_kick_work, cpu), cpu);
}
+static void tick_nohz_kick_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ int cpu = task_cpu(tsk);
+
+ /*
+ * If the task concurrently migrates to another cpu,
+ * we guarantee it sees the new tick dependency upon
+ * schedule.
+ *
+ *
+ * set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
+ * STORE p->cpu = @cpu
+ * __schedule() (switch to task 'p')
+ * LOCK rq->lock
+ * smp_mb__after_spin_lock() STORE p->tick_dep_mask
+ * tick_nohz_task_switch() smp_mb() (atomic_fetch_or())
+ * LOAD p->tick_dep_mask LOAD p->cpu
+ */
+
+ preempt_disable();
+ if (cpu_online(cpu))
+ tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(cpu);
+ preempt_enable();
+}
+
/*
* Kick all full dynticks CPUs in order to force these to re-evaluate
* their dependency on the tick and restart it if necessary.
@@ -404,19 +429,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tick_nohz_dep_clear_cpu);
*/
void tick_nohz_dep_set_task(struct task_struct *tsk, enum tick_dep_bits bit)
{
- if (!atomic_fetch_or(BIT(bit), &tsk->tick_dep_mask)) {
- if (tsk == current) {
- preempt_disable();
- tick_nohz_full_kick();
- preempt_enable();
- } else {
- /*
- * Some future tick_nohz_full_kick_task()
- * should optimize this.
- */
- tick_nohz_full_kick_all();
- }
- }
+ if (!atomic_fetch_or(BIT(bit), &tsk->tick_dep_mask))
+ tick_nohz_kick_task(tsk);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tick_nohz_dep_set_task);
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-22 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-22 12:01 [PATCH 0/8] tick/nohz updates v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-22 12:01 ` [PATCH 1/8] tick/nohz: Evaluate the CPU expression after the static key Frederic Weisbecker
2021-05-04 12:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-22 12:01 ` [PATCH 2/8] tick/nohz: Conditionally restart tick on idle exit Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-22 12:01 ` [PATCH 3/8] tick/nohz: Remove superflous check for CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE Frederic Weisbecker
2021-05-04 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-22 12:01 ` [PATCH 4/8] tick/nohz: Update idle_exittime on actual idle exit Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-22 12:01 ` [PATCH 5/8] tick/nohz: Update nohz_full Kconfig help Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-22 12:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2021-05-05 13:43 ` [PATCH 6/8] tick/nohz: Only wakeup a single target cpu when kicking a task Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-10 10:39 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-05-10 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-10 10:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-22 12:01 ` [PATCH 7/8] tick/nohz: Change signal tick dependency to wakeup CPUs of member tasks Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-22 12:01 ` [PATCH 8/8] tick/nohz: Kick only _queued_ task whose tick dependency is updated Frederic Weisbecker
2021-05-05 13:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-10 10:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-05-05 13:57 ` [PATCH 0/8] tick/nohz updates v2 Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210422120158.33629-7-frederic@kernel.org \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yeyunfeng@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.