All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	dev@dpdk.org, nd@arm.com, joyce.kong@arm.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] lib/mempool: distinguish debug counters from cache and pool
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 14:18:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210427121843.GK1726@platinum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210423012938.24770-3-dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>

Hi Dharmik,

Few comments below.

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 08:29:38PM -0500, Dharmik Thakkar wrote:
> From: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
> 
> If cache is enabled, objects will be retrieved/put from/to cache,
> subsequently from/to the common pool. Now the debug stats calculate
> the objects retrieved/put from/to cache and pool together, it is
> better to distinguish them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> ---
>  lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c | 16 +++++++++++++++
>  lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c
> index afb1239c8d48..e9343c2a7f6b 100644
> --- a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c
> +++ b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.c
> @@ -1244,6 +1244,14 @@ rte_mempool_dump(FILE *f, struct rte_mempool *mp)
>  	for (lcore_id = 0; lcore_id < RTE_MAX_LCORE; lcore_id++) {
>  		sum.put_bulk += mp->stats[lcore_id].put_bulk;
>  		sum.put_objs += mp->stats[lcore_id].put_objs;
> +		sum.put_common_pool_bulk +=
> +			mp->stats[lcore_id].put_common_pool_bulk;
> +		sum.put_common_pool_objs +=
> +			mp->stats[lcore_id].put_common_pool_objs;
> +		sum.get_common_pool_bulk +=
> +			mp->stats[lcore_id].get_common_pool_bulk;
> +		sum.get_common_pool_objs +=
> +			mp->stats[lcore_id].get_common_pool_objs;
>  		sum.get_success_bulk += mp->stats[lcore_id].get_success_bulk;
>  		sum.get_success_objs += mp->stats[lcore_id].get_success_objs;
>  		sum.get_fail_bulk += mp->stats[lcore_id].get_fail_bulk;
> @@ -1254,6 +1262,14 @@ rte_mempool_dump(FILE *f, struct rte_mempool *mp)
>  	fprintf(f, "  stats:\n");
>  	fprintf(f, "    put_bulk=%"PRIu64"\n", sum.put_bulk);
>  	fprintf(f, "    put_objs=%"PRIu64"\n", sum.put_objs);
> +	fprintf(f, "    put_common_pool_bulk=%"PRIu64"\n",
> +						sum.put_common_pool_bulk);
> +	fprintf(f, "    put_common_pool_objs=%"PRIu64"\n",
> +						sum.put_common_pool_objs);
> +	fprintf(f, "    get_common_pool_bulk=%"PRIu64"\n",
> +						sum.get_common_pool_bulk);
> +	fprintf(f, "    get_common_pool_objs=%"PRIu64"\n",
> +						sum.get_common_pool_objs);
>  	fprintf(f, "    get_success_bulk=%"PRIu64"\n", sum.get_success_bulk);
>  	fprintf(f, "    get_success_objs=%"PRIu64"\n", sum.get_success_objs);
>  	fprintf(f, "    get_fail_bulk=%"PRIu64"\n", sum.get_fail_bulk);
> diff --git a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h
> index 848a19226149..4343b287dc4e 100644
> --- a/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h
> +++ b/lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h
> @@ -64,14 +64,21 @@ extern "C" {
>  #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_MEMPOOL_DEBUG
>  /**
>   * A structure that stores the mempool statistics (per-lcore).
> + * Note: Cache stats (put_cache_bulk/objs, get_cache_bulk/objs) are not
> + * captured since they can be calculated from other stats.
> + * For example: put_cache_objs = put_objs - put_common_pool_objs.
>   */
>  struct rte_mempool_debug_stats {
> -	uint64_t put_bulk;         /**< Number of puts. */
> -	uint64_t put_objs;         /**< Number of objects successfully put. */
> -	uint64_t get_success_bulk; /**< Successful allocation number. */
> -	uint64_t get_success_objs; /**< Objects successfully allocated. */
> -	uint64_t get_fail_bulk;    /**< Failed allocation number. */
> -	uint64_t get_fail_objs;    /**< Objects that failed to be allocated. */
> +	uint64_t put_bulk;		  /**< Number of puts. */
> +	uint64_t put_objs;		  /**< Number of objects successfully put. */
> +	uint64_t put_common_pool_bulk;	  /**< Number of bulks enqueued in common pool. */
> +	uint64_t put_common_pool_objs;	  /**< Number of objects enqueued in common pool. */
> +	uint64_t get_common_pool_bulk;    /**< Number of bulks dequeued from common pool. */
> +	uint64_t get_common_pool_objs;	  /**< Number of objects dequeued from common pool. */
> +	uint64_t get_success_bulk;	  /**< Successful allocation number. */
> +	uint64_t get_success_objs;	  /**< Objects successfully allocated. */
> +	uint64_t get_fail_bulk;		  /**< Failed allocation number. */
> +	uint64_t get_fail_objs;		  /**< Objects that failed to be allocated. */
>  	/** Successful allocation number of contiguous blocks. */
>  	uint64_t get_success_blks;
>  	/** Failed allocation number of contiguous blocks. */
> @@ -699,10 +706,18 @@ rte_mempool_ops_dequeue_bulk(struct rte_mempool *mp,
>  		void **obj_table, unsigned n)
>  {
>  	struct rte_mempool_ops *ops;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	rte_mempool_trace_ops_dequeue_bulk(mp, obj_table, n);
>  	ops = rte_mempool_get_ops(mp->ops_index);
> -	return ops->dequeue(mp, obj_table, n);
> +	ret = ops->dequeue(mp, obj_table, n);
> +	if (ret == 0) {
> +		__MEMPOOL_STAT_ADD(mp, get_common_pool_bulk, 1);
> +		__MEMPOOL_STAT_ADD(mp, get_common_pool_objs, n);
> +		__MEMPOOL_STAT_ADD(mp, get_success_bulk, 1);
> +		__MEMPOOL_STAT_ADD(mp, get_success_objs, n);
> +	}
> +	return ret;
>  }

I think we should only have the common_pool stats here, for 2 reasons:

- more consistent with put()
- in case we are called by __mempool_generic_get() for a "backfill"
  operation, the number of successes will not be incremented by the
  correct value (the "req" variable is != n)

>  
>  /**
> @@ -749,6 +764,8 @@ rte_mempool_ops_enqueue_bulk(struct rte_mempool *mp, void * const *obj_table,
>  {
>  	struct rte_mempool_ops *ops;
>  
> +	__MEMPOOL_STAT_ADD(mp, put_common_pool_bulk, 1);
> +	__MEMPOOL_STAT_ADD(mp, put_common_pool_objs, n);
>  	rte_mempool_trace_ops_enqueue_bulk(mp, obj_table, n);
>  	ops = rte_mempool_get_ops(mp->ops_index);
>  	return ops->enqueue(mp, obj_table, n);
> @@ -1297,9 +1314,10 @@ __mempool_generic_put(struct rte_mempool *mp, void * const *obj_table,
>  
>  	/* Add elements back into the cache */
>  	rte_memcpy(&cache_objs[0], obj_table, sizeof(void *) * n);
> -
>  	cache->len += n;
>  
> +	__MEMPOOL_STAT_ADD(mp, put_cache_bulk, 1);
> +

This one was forgotten, there is a compilation error:

In file included from ../lib/mempool/rte_mempool_ops_default.c:7:
../lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h: In function ‘__mempool_generic_put’:
../lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h:1319:25: error: ‘struct rte_mempool_debug_stats’ has no member named ‘put_cache_bulk’; did you mean ‘put_bulk’?
  __MEMPOOL_STAT_ADD(mp, put_cache_bulk, 1);
                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../lib/mempool/rte_mempool.h:283:26: note: in definition of macro ‘__MEMPOOL_STAT_ADD’
    mp->stats[__lcore_id].name += n; \
                          ^~~~



>  	if (cache->len >= cache->flushthresh) {
>  		rte_mempool_ops_enqueue_bulk(mp, &cache->objs[cache->size],
>  				cache->len - cache->size);
> @@ -1430,6 +1448,9 @@ __mempool_generic_get(struct rte_mempool *mp, void **obj_table,
>  		}
>  
>  		cache->len += req;
> +	} else {
> +		__MEMPOOL_STAT_ADD(mp, get_success_bulk, 1);
> +		__MEMPOOL_STAT_ADD(mp, get_success_objs, n);
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Now fill in the response ... */
> @@ -1438,9 +1459,6 @@ __mempool_generic_get(struct rte_mempool *mp, void **obj_table,
>  
>  	cache->len -= n;
>  
> -	__MEMPOOL_STAT_ADD(mp, get_success_bulk, 1);
> -	__MEMPOOL_STAT_ADD(mp, get_success_objs, n);
> -
>  	return 0;
>  
>  ring_dequeue:
> @@ -1451,9 +1469,6 @@ __mempool_generic_get(struct rte_mempool *mp, void **obj_table,
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		__MEMPOOL_STAT_ADD(mp, get_fail_bulk, 1);
>  		__MEMPOOL_STAT_ADD(mp, get_fail_objs, n);
> -	} else {
> -		__MEMPOOL_STAT_ADD(mp, get_success_bulk, 1);
> -		__MEMPOOL_STAT_ADD(mp, get_success_objs, n);
>  	}
>  
>  	return ret;
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-27 12:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-18 11:20 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] lib/mempool: distinguish debug counters from cache and pool Joyce Kong
2021-04-07 14:28 ` Olivier Matz
2021-04-20  0:31   ` Dharmik Thakkar
2021-04-20  0:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] lib/mempool: add debug stats Dharmik Thakkar
2021-04-20  0:07   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] lib/mempool: make stats macro generic Dharmik Thakkar
2021-04-21 16:09     ` Olivier Matz
2021-04-20  0:08   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] lib/mempool: distinguish debug counters from cache and pool Dharmik Thakkar
2021-04-21 16:29     ` Olivier Matz
2021-04-22 21:27       ` Dharmik Thakkar
2021-04-22 21:47         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-04-23 10:41       ` Kinsella, Ray
2021-04-23  1:29   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] lib/mempool: add debug stats Dharmik Thakkar
2021-04-23  1:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] lib/mempool: make stats macro generic Dharmik Thakkar
2021-04-23  1:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] lib/mempool: distinguish debug counters from cache and pool Dharmik Thakkar
2021-04-23 20:29       ` Dharmik Thakkar
2021-04-27 12:18       ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2021-04-27 12:28     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] lib/mempool: add debug stats Olivier Matz
2021-04-27 16:01     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] mempool: " Dharmik Thakkar
2021-04-27 16:01       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] mempool: make stats macro generic Dharmik Thakkar
2021-04-27 16:01       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] mempool: distinguish debug counters from cache and pool Dharmik Thakkar
2021-05-04  6:54         ` Olivier Matz
2021-05-04  7:02       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] mempool: add debug stats David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210427121843.GK1726@platinum \
    --to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dharmik.thakkar@arm.com \
    --cc=joyce.kong@arm.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.