From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B59C433ED for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 21:07:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39F661157 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 21:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229577AbhECVIb (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 May 2021 17:08:31 -0400 Received: from mail.netfilter.org ([217.70.188.207]:41022 "EHLO mail.netfilter.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229570AbhECVIb (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 May 2021 17:08:31 -0400 Received: from us.es (unknown [90.77.255.23]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56B0F63087; Mon, 3 May 2021 23:06:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 23:07:34 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Ali Abdallah Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid potentially erroneos RST check Message-ID: <20210503210702.GA13695@salvia> References: <20210428131147.w2ppmrt6hpcjin5i@Fryzen495> <20210428143041.GA24118@salvia> <20210430092729.66f4jldpyqxedvpz@Fryzen495> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210430092729.66f4jldpyqxedvpz@Fryzen495> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 11:27:29AM +0200, Ali Abdallah wrote: > On 28.04.2021 16:30, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > I did not apply: > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netfilter-devel/patch/20210420122415.v2jtayiw3n4ds7t7@Fryzen495/ > > > > as you requested to send a v2. > > > > Would it make sense to squash this patch and ("Reset the max ACK flag > > on SYN in ignore state") in one single patch? > > > > Thanks. > > Yes, I will send a single patch then. Thanks. Thanks. There are three patches in patchwork now (they come with no versioning, not sure if one of these is replaced by another). So which ones below should be consider to be applied upstream? https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netfilter-devel/patch/20210420122415.v2jtayiw3n4ds7t7@Fryzen495/ https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netfilter-devel/patch/20210428130911.cteglt52r5if7ynp@Fryzen495/ https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netfilter-devel/patch/20210430093601.zibczc4cjnwx3qwn@Fryzen495/