All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>, xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mkfs is broken due to platform_zero_range
Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 10:51:09 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210504005109.GK63242@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210504002053.GC7448@magnolia>

On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 05:20:53PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> So... I have a machine with an nvme drive manufactured by a certain
> manufacturer who isn't known for the quality of their firmware
> implementation.  I'm pretty sure that this is a result of the use of
> fallocate(FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE) to zero the log during format.
> 
> If I format a device, mounting and repair both fail because the primary
> superblock UUID doesn't match the log UUID:
.....
> And the format works this time too:
> 
> [root@abacus654 ~]# strace -s99 -o /tmp/a mkfs.xfs /dev/nvme0n1  -f
> meta-data=/dev/nvme0n1           isize=512    agcount=6, agsize=268435455 blks
>          =                       sectsz=512   attr=2, projid32bit=1
>          =                       crc=1        finobt=1, sparse=1, rmapbt=0
>          =                       reflink=1
> data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=1542990848, imaxpct=5
>          =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
> naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0, ftype=1
> log      =internal log           bsize=4096   blocks=521728, version=2
>          =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
> realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0
> Discarding blocks...Done.
> (reverse-i-search)`-n': od -tx1 -Ad -c /tmp/badlog3 | head ^C15
> [root@abacus654 ~]# xfs_repair -n /dev/nvme0n1
> Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
> Phase 2 - using internal log
>         - zero log...
>         - scan filesystem freespace and inode maps...
>         - found root inode chunk
> Phase 3 - for each AG...
> 
> In conclusion, the drive firmware is broken.
> 
> Question: Should we be doing /some/ kind of re-read after a zeroing the
> log to detect these sh*tty firmwares and fall back to a pwrite()?

No, userspace should not have to wrok around broken hardware. The
kernel needs to blacklist/quirk this device so that it will do
either:

a) redirect to a zeroing mechanism that actually works on that
device; or

b) fail the fallocate() call with -EOPNOTSUPP so that the
application can fall back to manual zeroing.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-04  0:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-04  0:20 mkfs is broken due to platform_zero_range Darrick J. Wong
2021-05-04  0:51 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2021-05-04  6:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-04  7:04 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210504005109.GK63242@dread.disaster.area \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.