From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F06C433B4 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 07:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BF8613BA for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 07:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229684AbhEEHOY (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 03:14:24 -0400 Received: from www.zeus03.de ([194.117.254.33]:50220 "EHLO mail.zeus03.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229482AbhEEHOX (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 03:14:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=sang-engineering.com; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=tU/9Tu1LPJ8IbXSp6KGzWXrq7iJv FP9Px27Quq1K9Hw=; b=uUOzXV+FpZESd8+JT9BGDPV8GmMixtDs1TsUFsdEhahG LYOjRmNTDEe9FpjjzIGHqPwoTf/uiqLYA2kkOnRNd4QKFYDiT+XcyiMw2dp0Zvwx XmUl6d6GxfwLxeXWSonOkJDetbrzdyqPGLtT3ytpO7QIEhk5/8qrPWGdfJQFQNI= Received: (qmail 1676812 invoked from network); 5 May 2021 09:13:26 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 5 May 2021 09:13:26 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@2zIo7o/B3qIgAwDPXwRNAK21Lx9NnZcs Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 09:13:23 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Magnus Damm , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] ARM: dts: r8a7778: Correct internal delay for i2c[123] Message-ID: <20210505071323.GA1009@ninjato> References: <1eac63f15a776e492ff8a2d8447c5e1019982dd1.1620138979.git.geert+renesas@glider.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1eac63f15a776e492ff8a2d8447c5e1019982dd1.1620138979.git.geert+renesas@glider.be> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 04:41:24PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > According to the R-Car M1A Hardware User's Manual Rev. 1.00, the LSI > internal delay for I2C instances 1 to 3 is 5 ns (typ.), which differs > from the default 50 ns as specified for instance 0. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven I wonder if we shouldn't also specify the 50ns for IIC0 because it is describing the HW instead of relying on the Linux-only default value in the driver? Other than that: Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmCSRY8ACgkQFA3kzBSg KbYUVQ//bA+lZkesLj0UgTumvnuVKp+S9cPrCY9JgMyuYOUz4Et61K1ai9OO+mGb FlvPeDa2+zUzyu9TvD326w9tsU4m5Yy8U39iJvKZkbWD1P2xP2t+m75Kzo5V7HlZ H6kiiqUD+hpw4zlgRRFlTiuehtcy+I0FKjB9XDUBqRsitDT3VlaTV3uY9jv0END7 IIKQjpAlRpVeibVKaDa0bISX+k/2N5hCObk+Tks20K5G1sZL2IZDLtOjiR9ZVP/8 9vXI44KoyTa2wZIum6F/Cj2mAYbK41ScllQ0Ft0nbmHZdHheu7JxLysQe/cfWb/2 dXCQ4vpO0mC9pTSMU9wTaHiS4wAIhI98ov4qIARvl5xncG5vQ+eUUbTZTwqMIC+e Bg1Fqb2pAlpQTYKjBNRhNQId5rw1Brhig+buV9vRuFk16z31iCIKxWJhUmYP6wM5 oXC6ZIB00mhlijtcW6aZGGR8p2nlUIvKfe3R2uvEx3w9qKsMPTmw23SM8DCmjAwY E63/GBdwLD41Y2SaTEit9OXwpg5/vjXJesU7VHr1Il1raoadfe6HCINp8fhinM/M 2CwmoXTGHj+44QWEFt+nqzddC3RyUEnpO6jHcg4uxHyHLO2B9ZFPx2dBJoo8M6Lm fkAxGQSOeYMM0D3kvVCGQ5WbK3/MOJas4BC4GbpsNWl/25M8HMM= =uB7y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM--