From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Enrico Granata <egranata@google.com>,
virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Provide detailed specification of virtio-blk lifetime metrics
Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 16:10:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210505161022-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210505054314.GA4179527@infradead.org>
On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 06:43:14AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 04:25:56PM +0000, Enrico Granata wrote:
> > In the course of review, some concerns were surfaced about the
> > original virtio-blk lifetime proposal, as it depends on the eMMC
> > spec which is not open
> >
> > Add a more detailed description of the meaning of the fields
> > added by that proposal to the virtio-blk specification, as to
> > make it feasible to understand and implement the new lifetime
> > metrics feature without needing to refer to JEDEC's specification
> >
> > This patch does not change the meaning of those fields nor add
> > any new fields, but it is intended to provide an open and more
> > clear description of the meaning associated with those fields.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Enrico Granata <egranata@google.com>
>
> Still not a fan of the encoding, but at least it is properly documented
> now:
>
> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
With that, would you like to ack the virtip-blk patch too?
The format didn't actually change ...
--
MST
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Enrico Granata <egranata@google.com>,
virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH] Provide detailed specification of virtio-blk lifetime metrics
Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 16:10:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210505161022-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210505054314.GA4179527@infradead.org>
On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 06:43:14AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 04:25:56PM +0000, Enrico Granata wrote:
> > In the course of review, some concerns were surfaced about the
> > original virtio-blk lifetime proposal, as it depends on the eMMC
> > spec which is not open
> >
> > Add a more detailed description of the meaning of the fields
> > added by that proposal to the virtio-blk specification, as to
> > make it feasible to understand and implement the new lifetime
> > metrics feature without needing to refer to JEDEC's specification
> >
> > This patch does not change the meaning of those fields nor add
> > any new fields, but it is intended to provide an open and more
> > clear description of the meaning associated with those fields.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Enrico Granata <egranata@google.com>
>
> Still not a fan of the encoding, but at least it is properly documented
> now:
>
> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
With that, would you like to ack the virtip-blk patch too?
The format didn't actually change ...
--
MST
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org,
Enrico Granata <egranata@google.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Provide detailed specification of virtio-blk lifetime metrics
Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 16:10:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210505161022-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210505054314.GA4179527@infradead.org>
On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 06:43:14AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 04:25:56PM +0000, Enrico Granata wrote:
> > In the course of review, some concerns were surfaced about the
> > original virtio-blk lifetime proposal, as it depends on the eMMC
> > spec which is not open
> >
> > Add a more detailed description of the meaning of the fields
> > added by that proposal to the virtio-blk specification, as to
> > make it feasible to understand and implement the new lifetime
> > metrics feature without needing to refer to JEDEC's specification
> >
> > This patch does not change the meaning of those fields nor add
> > any new fields, but it is intended to provide an open and more
> > clear description of the meaning associated with those fields.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Enrico Granata <egranata@google.com>
>
> Still not a fan of the encoding, but at least it is properly documented
> now:
>
> Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
With that, would you like to ack the virtip-blk patch too?
The format didn't actually change ...
--
MST
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-05 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-20 16:25 [PATCH] Provide detailed specification of virtio-blk lifetime metrics Enrico Granata
2021-04-20 16:27 ` [virtio-dev] Fwd: " Enrico Granata
2021-05-02 9:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-05-02 9:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-05-02 9:12 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-05-05 10:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-05-05 10:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-05-05 10:34 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-05-05 19:41 ` Enrico Granata
2021-05-05 19:41 ` [virtio-dev] " Enrico Granata
2021-05-05 5:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-05 5:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-05 20:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2021-05-05 20:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-05-05 20:10 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-05-05 21:01 ` Enrico Granata
2021-05-05 21:01 ` Enrico Granata
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210505161022-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=egranata@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.