All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: f.fainelli@gmail.com, Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	osstest service owner <osstest-admin@xenproject.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: Regression when booting 5.15 as dom0 on arm64 (WAS: Re: [linux-linus test] 161829: regressions - FAIL)]
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 18:49:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210511164933.GA19775@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2105110925430.5018@sstabellini-ThinkPad-T480s>

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 09:47:33AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> That's a much better plan. It is also not super urgent, so maybe for now
> we could add an explicit check for io_tlb_default_mem != NULL at the
> beginning of xen_swiotlb_init? So that at least we can fail explicitly
> or ignore it explicitly rather than by accident.

Fine with me.  Do you want to take over from here and test and submit
your version?
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>,
	f.fainelli@gmail.com,
	"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	osstest service owner <osstest-admin@xenproject.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Regression when booting 5.15 as dom0 on arm64 (WAS: Re: [linux-linus test] 161829: regressions - FAIL)]
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 18:49:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210511164933.GA19775@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2105110925430.5018@sstabellini-ThinkPad-T480s>

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 09:47:33AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> That's a much better plan. It is also not super urgent, so maybe for now
> we could add an explicit check for io_tlb_default_mem != NULL at the
> beginning of xen_swiotlb_init? So that at least we can fail explicitly
> or ignore it explicitly rather than by accident.

Fine with me.  Do you want to take over from here and test and submit
your version?


  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-11 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-07 21:00 [linux-linus test] 161829: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
2021-05-07 23:32 ` Regression when booting 5.15 as dom0 on arm64 (WAS: Re: [linux-linus test] 161829: regressions - FAIL) Julien Grall
2021-05-07 23:32   ` Julien Grall
2021-05-10  8:40   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-10  8:40     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-10 18:15     ` Julien Grall
2021-05-10 18:15       ` Julien Grall
2021-05-10 19:04       ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-10 19:04         ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-11  1:46     ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-05-11  1:46       ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-05-11  6:35       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-11  6:35         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-11 16:47         ` Regression when booting 5.15 as dom0 on arm64 (WAS: Re: [linux-linus test] 161829: regressions - FAIL)] Stefano Stabellini
2021-05-11 16:47           ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-05-11 16:49           ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-05-11 16:49             ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-11 16:51             ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-05-11 16:51               ` Stefano Stabellini
2021-05-11 17:01               ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-11 17:01                 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210511164933.GA19775@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=osstest-admin@xenproject.org \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.