All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	linux-rdma <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] RDMA/cm: Delete two redundant condition branches
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 16:56:21 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210511195621.GA1317703@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210510090840.3474-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>

On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 05:08:40PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> The statement of the last "if (xxx)" branch is the same as the "else"
> branch. Delete it to simplify code.
> 
> No functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c
> index 0ead0d223154011..510beb25f5b8a0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c
> @@ -668,8 +668,6 @@ static struct cm_id_private *cm_insert_listen(struct cm_id_private *cm_id_priv,
>  			link = &(*link)->rb_right;
>  		else if (be64_lt(service_id, cur_cm_id_priv->id.service_id))
>  			link = &(*link)->rb_left;
> -		else if (be64_gt(service_id, cur_cm_id_priv->id.service_id))
> -			link = &(*link)->rb_right;
>  		else
>  			link = &(*link)->rb_right;
>  	}
> @@ -700,8 +698,6 @@ static struct cm_id_private *cm_find_listen(struct ib_device *device,
>  			node = node->rb_right;
>  		else if (be64_lt(service_id, cm_id_priv->id.service_id))
>  			node = node->rb_left;
> -		else if (be64_gt(service_id, cm_id_priv->id.service_id))
> -			node = node->rb_right;
>  		else
>  			node = node->rb_right;
>  	}

I don't like this, if you want to reorganize this function then it
should be written in the normal pattern for this kind of comparision

 if (a < b)
   ..
 else if (a > b)
   ..
 else // a == b
   ..

You can see the a==b clause written explicitly above this if ladder:

		if ((cur_cm_id_priv->id.service_mask & service_id) ==
		    (service_mask & cur_cm_id_priv->id.service_id) &&
		    (cm_id_priv->id.device == cur_cm_id_priv->id.device)) {

Which is why the trailing else is just unexectuable code.

Jason

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-11 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-10  9:08 [PATCH 1/1] RDMA/cm: Delete two redundant condition branches Zhen Lei
2021-05-10  9:50 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-05-11 19:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-05-12  1:35   ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2021-05-12  2:17     ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210511195621.GA1317703@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.