All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Chen <peter.chen@kernel.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>,
	USB mailing list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Disconnect race in Gadget core
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 17:37:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210512093748.GA17479@nchen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210511191538.GC908414@rowland.harvard.edu>

On 21-05-11 15:15:38, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:53:22AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> > Hi Alan,
> > 
> > I fixed a similar issue for configfs, see 1a1c851bbd70
> > ("usb: gadget: configfs: fix concurrent issue between composite APIs")
> 
> Yes, I see.  That is indeed the very same problem.
> 
> > It doesn't prevent disconnect callback, the disconnect callback will check
> > if unbind has called. The same for .setup and .suspend. Did you see
> > issues using configfs or legacy gadget? For legacy gadget, just like you said
> > it is the second disconnect callback is called during the removal process,
> > the first is called at usb_gadget_disconnect. It is not easy to prevent disconnect
> > occurring, we could add some logic at composite_disconnect, and let it quit if it is
> > called the second time.
> 
> I haven't seen the race occur in operation.  It was only theoretical; I 
> noticed it while thinking about one of the commits that was just merged 
> into the -stable kernels.
> 
> > It is hard to avoid usb_gadget_driver callback until usb_gadget_udc_stop has called,
> > no matter bad hardware or threaded interrupts, my former solution is avoid
> > dereferenced pointer issue, most of callbacks handling are useless if the gadget has already
> > unbind, the only meaningful callback is disconnect, and we have already called it
> > at usb_gadget_disconnect
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> I suppose we could do something similar for the composite driver, for 
> gadgets that don't use configfs.

Originally, I intended to do at composite.c to cover all gadget drivers, but
I can't find a good way to use usb_composite_dev existing spinlock to do that.
Since most of users already used configfs, I chose to fix it at configfs directly.
If we want to fix it for legacy gadget drivers (drivers at drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/).

For .setup & .suspend, we could delay 10ms after usb_gadget_disconnect, ensure
hardware has triggered related interrupt, and we need to let all UDC drivers to
add udc->gadget->irq, in that case, the pending threaded interrupt will be handled
at synchronize_irq at usb_gadget_remove_driver.
For .disconnect, we could use cdev->config to judge if the first .disconnect
has run.

> But what about legacy gadgets?  Are 
> there any still around that don't use either configfs or the composite 
> framework?

I only find raw_gadget.c that doesn't use composite framework, and it doesn't implement
many usb_gadget_driver callbacks, eg, .disconnect and .suspend. For .setup, we could
use above solutions for legacy composite driver.

-- 

Thanks,
Peter Chen


  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-12  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-10 15:24 Disconnect race in Gadget core Alan Stern
2021-05-10 16:43 ` Felipe Balbi
2021-05-10 19:38   ` Alan Stern
2021-05-11  2:53     ` Peter Chen
2021-05-11 19:15       ` Alan Stern
2021-05-12  9:37         ` Peter Chen [this message]
2021-05-12  9:41           ` Felipe Balbi
2021-05-12 19:33           ` Alan Stern
2021-05-11  8:22     ` Felipe Balbi
2021-05-11 21:26       ` Alan Stern
2021-05-12  7:00         ` Felipe Balbi
2021-05-12 15:33           ` Alan Stern
2021-05-14  7:35             ` Felipe Balbi
2021-05-14 16:58               ` Alan Stern
2021-05-15  6:41                 ` Felipe Balbi
2021-05-15 15:31                   ` Alan Stern
2021-05-16  9:43                     ` Felipe Balbi
2021-05-16 14:51                       ` Alan Stern
2021-05-17  2:00                         ` Peter Chen
2021-05-17  5:33                           ` Felipe Balbi
2021-05-17  5:35                         ` Felipe Balbi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210512093748.GA17479@nchen \
    --to=peter.chen@kernel.org \
    --cc=balbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.