From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>
Cc: zyjzyj2000@gmail.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
Bob Pearson <rpearson@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next v6 04/10] RDMA/rxe: Add ib_alloc_mw and ib_dealloc_mw verbs
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 17:09:01 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210518200901.GA2489365@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210429184855.54939-5-rpearson@hpe.com>
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 01:48:49PM -0500, Bob Pearson wrote:
> @@ -1106,6 +1108,7 @@ static const struct ib_device_ops rxe_dev_ops = {
>
> INIT_RDMA_OBJ_SIZE(ib_ah, rxe_ah, ibah),
> INIT_RDMA_OBJ_SIZE(ib_cq, rxe_cq, ibcq),
> + INIT_RDMA_OBJ_SIZE(ib_mw, rxe_mw, ibmw),
> INIT_RDMA_OBJ_SIZE(ib_pd, rxe_pd, ibpd),
> INIT_RDMA_OBJ_SIZE(ib_srq, rxe_srq, ibsrq),
> INIT_RDMA_OBJ_SIZE(ib_ucontext, rxe_ucontext, ibuc),
ib_mw is already listed below:
INIT_RDMA_OBJ_SIZE(ib_mw, rxe_mw, ibmw),
?
You added it in
RDMA/rxe: Split MEM into MR and MW
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-18 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-29 18:48 [PATCH for-next v6 00/10] RDMA/rxe: Implement memory windows Bob Pearson
2021-04-29 18:48 ` [PATCH for-next v6 01/10] RDMA/rxe: Add bind MW fields to rxe_send_wr Bob Pearson
2021-04-29 18:48 ` [PATCH for-next v6 02/10] RDMA/rxe: Return errors for add index and key Bob Pearson
2021-04-29 18:48 ` [PATCH for-next v6 03/10] RDMA/rxe: Enable MW object pool Bob Pearson
2021-04-29 18:48 ` [PATCH for-next v6 04/10] RDMA/rxe: Add ib_alloc_mw and ib_dealloc_mw verbs Bob Pearson
2021-05-18 20:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-05-19 8:18 ` Zhu Yanjun
2021-04-29 18:48 ` [PATCH for-next v6 05/10] RDMA/rxe: Replace WR_REG_MASK by WR_LOCAL_OP_MASK Bob Pearson
2021-04-29 18:48 ` [PATCH for-next v6 06/10] RDMA/rxe: Move local ops to subroutine Bob Pearson
2021-04-29 18:48 ` [PATCH for-next v6 07/10] RDMA/rxe: Add support for bind MW work requests Bob Pearson
2021-04-29 18:48 ` [PATCH for-next v6 08/10] RDMA/rxe: Implement invalidate MW operations Bob Pearson
2021-04-29 18:48 ` [PATCH for-next v6 09/10] RDMA/rxe: Implement memory access through MWs Bob Pearson
2021-04-29 18:48 ` [PATCH for-next v6 10/10] RDMA/rxe: Disallow MR dereg and invalidate when bound Bob Pearson
2021-05-01 5:54 ` [PATCH for-next v6 00/10] RDMA/rxe: Implement memory windows Zhu Yanjun
2021-05-01 17:02 ` Pearson, Robert B
2021-05-19 18:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210518200901.GA2489365@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpearson@hpe.com \
--cc=rpearsonhpe@gmail.com \
--cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.