All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: iomap: writeback ioend/bio allocation deadlock risk
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 17:32:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210524153247.GA6041@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YKd1VS5gkzQRn+7x@T590>

On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 04:54:45PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 10:36:35AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 04:35:03PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > Just wondering why the ioend isn't submitted out after it becomes full?
> > 
> > block layer plugging?  Although failing bio allocations will kick that,
> > so that is not a deadlock risk.
> 
> These ioends are just added to one list stored on local stack variable(submit_list),

Yes.  But only until the code finished iterating over a page.  The
worst case number of bios for a page is PAGE_SIZE / SECTOR_SIZE, and
the bio_set is side to handle that comfortably.

> how can block layer plugging observe & submit them out?

It can't.  I was talking about the high-level plug that is held
over multiple pages.  At that point the bios are submitted to the
block layer already, but they might be held in a plug.  And looking at
the bio_alloc_bioset code we don't actually flush a plug at the moment
in that case.  Something like the patch below would do that:

diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
index 44205dfb6b60..5b9d2f4d7c08 100644
--- a/block/bio.c
+++ b/block/bio.c
@@ -432,6 +432,7 @@ struct bio *bio_alloc_bioset(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned short nr_iovecs,
 
 	p = mempool_alloc(&bs->bio_pool, gfp_mask);
 	if (!p && gfp_mask != saved_gfp) {
+		blk_schedule_flush_plug(current);
 		punt_bios_to_rescuer(bs);
 		gfp_mask = saved_gfp;
 		p = mempool_alloc(&bs->bio_pool, gfp_mask);

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-24 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-21  3:27 iomap: writeback ioend/bio allocation deadlock risk Ming Lei
2021-05-21  7:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-21  7:31   ` Ming Lei
2021-05-21  7:35     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-21  8:35       ` Ming Lei
2021-05-21  8:36         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-21  8:54           ` Ming Lei
2021-05-24 15:32             ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-05-24 23:55             ` Dave Chinner
2021-05-25  4:54               ` Ming Lei
2021-05-25  6:28                 ` Ming Lei
2021-05-25  8:21                   ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210524153247.GA6041@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.