From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de, Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>,
Gary Bisson <gary.bisson@boundarydevices.com>,
Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>,
Roman Kovalivskyi <roman.kovalivskyi@globallogic.com>,
Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fastboot: Fix overflow when calculating chunk size
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 17:25:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210526212558.GA23831@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210416215821.3575989-1-sean.anderson@seco.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3136 bytes --]
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 05:58:21PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> If a chunk was larger than 4GiB, then chunk_data_sz would overflow and
> blkcnt would not be calculated correctly. Upgrade it to a u64 and cast
> its multiplicands as well. Also fix bytes_written while we're at it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
> Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
> ---
>
> lib/image-sparse.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/image-sparse.c b/lib/image-sparse.c
> index 187ac28cd3..52c8dcc08c 100644
> --- a/lib/image-sparse.c
> +++ b/lib/image-sparse.c
> @@ -55,10 +55,10 @@ int write_sparse_image(struct sparse_storage *info,
> lbaint_t blk;
> lbaint_t blkcnt;
> lbaint_t blks;
> - uint32_t bytes_written = 0;
> + uint64_t bytes_written = 0;
> unsigned int chunk;
> unsigned int offset;
> - unsigned int chunk_data_sz;
> + uint64_t chunk_data_sz;
> uint32_t *fill_buf = NULL;
> uint32_t fill_val;
> sparse_header_t *sparse_header;
> @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ int write_sparse_image(struct sparse_storage *info,
> sizeof(chunk_header_t));
> }
>
> - chunk_data_sz = sparse_header->blk_sz * chunk_header->chunk_sz;
> + chunk_data_sz = ((u64)sparse_header->blk_sz) * chunk_header->chunk_sz;
> blkcnt = chunk_data_sz / info->blksz;
> switch (chunk_header->chunk_type) {
> case CHUNK_TYPE_RAW:
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ int write_sparse_image(struct sparse_storage *info,
> return -1;
> }
> blk += blks;
> - bytes_written += blkcnt * info->blksz;
> + bytes_written += ((u64)blkcnt) * info->blksz;
> total_blocks += chunk_header->chunk_sz;
> data += chunk_data_sz;
> break;
> @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ int write_sparse_image(struct sparse_storage *info,
> blk += blks;
> i += j;
> }
> - bytes_written += blkcnt * info->blksz;
> + bytes_written += ((u64)blkcnt) * info->blksz;
> total_blocks += chunk_data_sz / sparse_header->blk_sz;
> free(fill_buf);
> break;
> @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ int write_sparse_image(struct sparse_storage *info,
>
> debug("Wrote %d blocks, expected to write %d blocks\n",
> total_blocks, sparse_header->total_blks);
> - printf("........ wrote %u bytes to '%s'\n", bytes_written, part_name);
> + printf("........ wrote %llu bytes to '%s'\n", bytes_written, part_name);
>
> if (total_blocks != sparse_header->total_blks) {
> info->mssg("sparse image write failure", response);
This results in things like:
pico-dwarf-imx7d: all +506 bss +48 rodata +2 text +456
u-boot: add: 1/0, grow: 1/0 bytes: 452/0 (452)
function old new delta
__aeabi_uldivmod - 392 +392
write_sparse_image 712 772 +60
Which I believe means that some of the division above needs to be
converted to use do_div(). Since I can't easily confirm the changes,
can you please check in to it? Thanks.
--
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-26 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-16 21:58 [PATCH] fastboot: Fix overflow when calculating chunk size Sean Anderson
2021-04-19 4:31 ` Heiko Schocher
2021-04-19 14:13 ` Sean Anderson
2021-05-13 15:54 ` Sean Anderson
2021-05-25 15:45 ` Sean Anderson
2021-05-26 7:12 ` Lukasz Majewski
2021-05-26 21:25 ` Tom Rini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210526212558.GA23831@bill-the-cat \
--to=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=gary.bisson@boundarydevices.com \
--cc=hs@denx.de \
--cc=lukma@denx.de \
--cc=patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com \
--cc=roman.kovalivskyi@globallogic.com \
--cc=sean.anderson@seco.com \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.