From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.ganu@linaro.org>,
U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: EFI from usb HDD
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 21:59:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210610125915.GA96492@laputa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e0bbf987-2ebe-df83-0f53-9c5d7b0a255e@xilinx.com>
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 02:31:46PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>
>
> On 6/10/21 12:51 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > On 6/10/21 12:04 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 6/10/21 11:47 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >>> On 6/10/21 10:44 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I am playing with booting from USB via EFI. And I see very weird
> >>>> behavior. I have burnt image with grub to USB flashdisk and I have
> >>>> tested it on 3 zynqmp boards. zcu102, zcu104 and SOM Kria board.
> >>>> On zcu102 grub is going to boot menu and everything is working fine as
> >>>> expected.
> >>>> On zcu104 and SOM Kria I am able to get grub not to menu. When I list
> >>>> partitions in grub I see that only SDs are listed:
> >>>> grub> ls
> >>>> (hd0) (hd0,msdos1) (hd1) (hd1,msdos1)
> >>>
> >>> Hello Michal,
> >>>
> >>> thanks for sharing your observations.
> >>>
> >>> What devices do hd0 and hd1 relate to?
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On zcu102(working board) I also see usb(gpt) partitions and SD.
> >>>> grub> ls
> >>>> (hd0) (hd0,gpt2) (hd0,gpt1) (hd1) (hd1,msdos1)
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> GPT and MBR partitioning are independent of the device type.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On zcu104 I see one more error message
> >>>> "PE image measurement failed"
> >>>
> >>> This is related to CONFIG_EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL=y. Do you have a TPMv2? This
> >>> will not stop disk enumeration.
> >>>
> >>>> But I can't see it on SOM.
> >>>>
> >>>> U-Boot image is just the same for all boards. I am using generic
> >>>> xilinx_zynqmp_virt_defconfig.
> >>>>
> >>>> When I compare DT description for USB between zcu102 and zcu104 they
> >>>> are
> >>>> the same. SOM doesn't have usb enabled by default (but I enabled it)
> >>>> but
> >>>> grub starts which means that communication with USB is fine.
> >>>>
> >>>> It is based on my latest patches available here.
> >>>> u-boot/custodians/u-boot-microblaze.git (usb-efi-issue branch)
> >>>>
> >>>> Also when I list usb I see all partitions just fine.
> >>>> ZynqMP> part list usb 0
> >>>>
> >>>> Partition Map for USB device 0 -- Partition Type: EFI
> >>>>
> >>>> Part Start LBA End LBA Name
> >>>> Attributes
> >>>> Type GUID
> >>>> Partition GUID
> >>>> 1 0x00000800 0x001007fe "Microsoft basic data"
> >>>> attrs: 0x0000000000000000
> >>>> type: ebd0a0a2-b9e5-4433-87c0-68b6b72699c7
> >>>> type: data
> >>>> guid: 0e7f8b3d-296b-4720-be9d-c4687d3c4a77
> >>>> 2 0x00100800 0x001197fe "Microsoft basic data"
> >>>> attrs: 0x0000000000000000
> >>>> type: ebd0a0a2-b9e5-4433-87c0-68b6b72699c7
> >>>> type: data
> >>>> guid: 8892eddc-231a-4e6e-a5e1-c310f4482fb7
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you have any idea why on one system is working fine to get to menu
> >>>> and on others there is an issue to get all partitions even u-boot is
> >>>> able to see them and can work with them.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Michal
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Where is the GRUB binary? - If it is in EFI/boot/bootaa64.efi, it could
> >>> be that the USB sub-system is simply not initialized yet when the boot
> >>> manager is called by distroboot.
> >>>
> >>> For testing partition detection in the UEFI sub-system it is enough
> >>> to run
> >>>
> >>> efidebug devices
> >>>
> >>> Until yesterday we had a problem with partition numbers >= 10, cf.
> >>>
> >>> efi_loader: partition numbers are hexadecimal
> >>> https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/commit/3dca77b1dc1b6dbf9c8b51572fe4b0553cef009f
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Block devices are enumerated in efi_disk_register(). Please, try to add
> >>> debug output there to elucidate the problem.
> >>
> >> I found where the problem is. First of all zcu102 didn't use the same
> >> image as others (it wasn't updated properly).
> >> When you have CONFIG_EFI_CAPSULE_ON_DISK_EARLY that efi_disk_register()
> >> is called before usb block devices are detected and registered that's
> >> why grub doesn't see them.
> >
> > The problem is CONFIG_EFI_SETUP_EARLY=y required by
> > CONFIG_EFI_CAPSULE_ON_DISK_EARLY.
> >
> > Why is USB initialized later then MMC?
>
> It is not just usb. SCSI/sata are behaving in the same way too.
>
> >
> > Overall we have a deficiency in the UEFI implementation in that we
> > cannot deal with block devices added or removed after initialization.
> >
> > Here integration with the driver model is missing.
>
> Right. And also there are commands which can create MBR partitions and I
> expect when you write image to SD and then run rescan or so you could
> get other partitions too.
> Maybe hook via part_init()? with removing efi_disk_register.
For the record, I have proposed my ideas several times[1], [2].
I'm, however, no longer working on this issue as I have shifted
my focus to UEFI secure boot and capsule update.
-Takahiro Akashi
[1] https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2018-November/347491.html
[2] https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2019-February/357923.html
> >
> >> I was looking at adding usb start in preboot but preboot is called later.
> >> How this should be solved? Any idea?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Michal
> >>
> >>
> > +cc Sughosh, Takahiro (who have developed the capsule code)
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-10 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-10 8:44 EFI from usb HDD Michal Simek
2021-06-10 9:47 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-06-10 10:04 ` Michal Simek
2021-06-10 10:51 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2021-06-10 12:31 ` Michal Simek
2021-06-10 12:59 ` AKASHI Takahiro [this message]
2021-07-29 14:09 ` Michal Simek
2021-07-30 2:35 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2021-07-30 4:41 ` Michal Simek
2021-07-30 5:33 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2021-07-30 6:22 ` Michal Simek
2021-08-04 10:50 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2021-08-11 12:28 ` Michal Simek
2021-08-12 9:43 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2021-08-17 7:20 ` Michal Simek
2021-08-18 5:13 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2021-08-18 9:07 ` Michal Simek
2021-08-19 4:14 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2021-08-19 5:38 ` Michal Simek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210610125915.GA96492@laputa \
--to=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=sughosh.ganu@linaro.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.