From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Bruno Goncalves <bgoncalv@redhat.com>,
CKI Project <cki-project@redhat.com>,
skt-results-master@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Fine Fan <ffan@redhat.com>,
Jeff Bastian <jbastian@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: ? PANICKED: Test report for kernel 5.13.0-rc3 (block, 30ec225a)
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 18:00:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210615160027.GA31772@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFj5m9Kp4T1R_RB1B4W3dvjU5M17wWCZ6OVbvYWjXLcGvab6=A@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 09:58:03PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 7:52 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 02:40:58PM +0200, Bruno Goncalves wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We've noticed a kernel oops during the stress-ng test on aarch64 more log
> > > details on [1]. Christoph, do you think this could be related to the recent
> > > blk_cleanup_disk changes [2]?
> >
> > It doesn't really look very related. Any chance you could bisect it?
>
> It should be the wrong order between freeing tagset and cleanup disk:
>
> static void loop_remove(struct loop_device *lo)
> {
> ...
> blk_mq_free_tag_set(&lo->tag_set);
> blk_cleanup_disk(lo->lo_disk);
> ...
> }
Indeed. Something like this should fix the issue:
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index 9a48b3f9a15c..e0c4de392eab 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -2172,8 +2172,8 @@ static int loop_add(struct loop_device **l, int i)
static void loop_remove(struct loop_device *lo)
{
del_gendisk(lo->lo_disk);
- blk_mq_free_tag_set(&lo->tag_set);
blk_cleanup_disk(lo->lo_disk);
+ blk_mq_free_tag_set(&lo->tag_set);
mutex_destroy(&lo->lo_mutex);
kfree(lo);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-15 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-14 12:35 💥 PANICKED: Test report for kernel 5.13.0-rc3 (block, 30ec225a) CKI Project
2021-06-14 12:54 ` Bruno Goncalves
[not found] ` <CA+QYu4qjrzyjM_zgJ8SSZ-zsodcK=uk8xToAVR3+kmOdNZfgZQ@mail.gmail.com>
2021-06-15 11:52 ` ? " Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 13:58 ` Ming Lei
2021-06-15 16:00 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-06-16 10:54 ` Bruno Goncalves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210615160027.GA31772@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bgoncalv@redhat.com \
--cc=cki-project@redhat.com \
--cc=ffan@redhat.com \
--cc=jbastian@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=skt-results-master@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.