From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BAC8C48BDF for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D61B261245 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:32:18 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D61B261245 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F6B6E0A1; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:32:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 963436E0A1; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:32:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 64B2C68D08; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:32:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:32:12 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Tom Lendacky Message-ID: <20210618143212.GA19284@lst.de> References: <20210617062635.1660944-1-tientzu@chromium.org> <20210617062635.1660944-2-tientzu@chromium.org> <741a34cc-547c-984d-8af4-2f309880acfa@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <741a34cc-547c-984d-8af4-2f309880acfa@amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v13 01/12] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb init functions X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com, thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, grant.likely@arm.com, paulus@samba.org, Frank Rowand , mingo@kernel.org, Marek Szyprowski , Stefano Stabellini , Saravana Kannan , mpe@ellerman.id.au, Joerg Roedel , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Christoph Hellwig , Bartosz Golaszewski , bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Thierry Reding , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@intel.com, linux-devicetree , Jianxiong Gao , Will Deacon , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , airlied@linux.ie, Dan Williams , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Rob Herring , Bjorn Helgaas , Claire Chang , boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, Andy Shevchenko , jgross@suse.com, Nicolas Boichat , Greg KH , Randy Dunlap , lkml , Tomasz Figa , "list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" , Jim Quinlan , xypron.glpk@gmx.de, Robin Murphy , bauerman@linux.ibm.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 09:09:17AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > > swiotlb_init_with_tbl uses memblock_alloc to allocate the io_tlb_mem > > and memblock_alloc[1] will do memset in memblock_alloc_try_nid[2], so > > swiotlb_init_with_tbl is also good. > > I'm happy to add the memset in swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem if you think > > it's clearer and safer. > > On x86, if the memset is done before set_memory_decrypted() and memory > encryption is active, then the memory will look like ciphertext afterwards > and not be zeroes. If zeroed memory is required, then a memset must be > done after the set_memory_decrypted() calls. Which should be fine - we don't care that the memory is cleared to 0, just that it doesn't leak other data. Maybe a comment would be useful, though, _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726F9C48BDF for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:32:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BF9E61154 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:32:24 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2BF9E61154 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E15C883CB7; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:32:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3nrLBQGbAG00; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:32:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [140.211.9.56]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E385483C9F; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:32:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C58C000D; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:32:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D377DC000B for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84AC83CA3 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:32:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zOW0SsHLvhhD for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:32:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3935483CA1 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:32:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 64B2C68D08; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:32:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:32:12 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Tom Lendacky Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 01/12] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb init functions Message-ID: <20210618143212.GA19284@lst.de> References: <20210617062635.1660944-1-tientzu@chromium.org> <20210617062635.1660944-2-tientzu@chromium.org> <741a34cc-547c-984d-8af4-2f309880acfa@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <741a34cc-547c-984d-8af4-2f309880acfa@amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com, thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, grant.likely@arm.com, paulus@samba.org, Frank Rowand , mingo@kernel.org, Stefano Stabellini , Saravana Kannan , mpe@ellerman.id.au, "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Christoph Hellwig , Bartosz Golaszewski , bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Thierry Reding , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@intel.com, linux-devicetree , Jianxiong Gao , Daniel Vetter , Will Deacon , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, airlied@linux.ie, Dan Williams , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, Rob Herring , rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, Bjorn Helgaas , Claire Chang , boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, Andy Shevchenko , jgross@suse.com, Nicolas Boichat , Greg KH , Randy Dunlap , lkml , "list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" , Jim Quinlan , xypron.glpk@gmx.de, Robin Murphy , bauerman@linux.ibm.com X-BeenThere: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues for Linux IOMMU support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "iommu" On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 09:09:17AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > > swiotlb_init_with_tbl uses memblock_alloc to allocate the io_tlb_mem > > and memblock_alloc[1] will do memset in memblock_alloc_try_nid[2], so > > swiotlb_init_with_tbl is also good. > > I'm happy to add the memset in swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem if you think > > it's clearer and safer. > > On x86, if the memset is done before set_memory_decrypted() and memory > encryption is active, then the memory will look like ciphertext afterwards > and not be zeroes. If zeroed memory is required, then a memset must be > done after the set_memory_decrypted() calls. Which should be fine - we don't care that the memory is cleared to 0, just that it doesn't leak other data. Maybe a comment would be useful, though, _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E80C49EA5 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A7161260 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234556AbhFROe1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jun 2021 10:34:27 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:35190 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233642AbhFROe1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jun 2021 10:34:27 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 64B2C68D08; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:32:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:32:12 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Tom Lendacky Cc: Claire Chang , Stefano Stabellini , Rob Herring , mpe@ellerman.id.au, Joerg Roedel , Will Deacon , Frank Rowand , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, jgross@suse.com, Christoph Hellwig , Marek Szyprowski , benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, "list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" , Robin Murphy , grant.likely@arm.com, xypron.glpk@gmx.de, Thierry Reding , mingo@kernel.org, bauerman@linux.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, Greg KH , Saravana Kannan , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com, Andy Shevchenko , Randy Dunlap , Dan Williams , Bartosz Golaszewski , linux-devicetree , lkml , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Nicolas Boichat , Jim Quinlan , Tomasz Figa , bskeggs@redhat.com, Bjorn Helgaas , chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, Daniel Vetter , airlied@linux.ie, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, Jianxiong Gao , joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, matthew.auld@intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 01/12] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb init functions Message-ID: <20210618143212.GA19284@lst.de> References: <20210617062635.1660944-1-tientzu@chromium.org> <20210617062635.1660944-2-tientzu@chromium.org> <741a34cc-547c-984d-8af4-2f309880acfa@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <741a34cc-547c-984d-8af4-2f309880acfa@amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 09:09:17AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > > swiotlb_init_with_tbl uses memblock_alloc to allocate the io_tlb_mem > > and memblock_alloc[1] will do memset in memblock_alloc_try_nid[2], so > > swiotlb_init_with_tbl is also good. > > I'm happy to add the memset in swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem if you think > > it's clearer and safer. > > On x86, if the memset is done before set_memory_decrypted() and memory > encryption is active, then the memory will look like ciphertext afterwards > and not be zeroes. If zeroed memory is required, then a memset must be > done after the set_memory_decrypted() calls. Which should be fine - we don't care that the memory is cleared to 0, just that it doesn't leak other data. Maybe a comment would be useful, though, From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79755C48BE8 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:32:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFB3761154 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:32:42 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CFB3761154 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4G61bs6lk9z3c0S for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 00:32:41 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=lst.de (client-ip=213.95.11.211; helo=verein.lst.de; envelope-from=hch@lst.de; receiver=) Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4G61bT5N1Zz3bvR for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 00:32:20 +1000 (AEST) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 64B2C68D08; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:32:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:32:12 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Tom Lendacky Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 01/12] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb init functions Message-ID: <20210618143212.GA19284@lst.de> References: <20210617062635.1660944-1-tientzu@chromium.org> <20210617062635.1660944-2-tientzu@chromium.org> <741a34cc-547c-984d-8af4-2f309880acfa@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <741a34cc-547c-984d-8af4-2f309880acfa@amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com, thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, grant.likely@arm.com, paulus@samba.org, Frank Rowand , mingo@kernel.org, Marek Szyprowski , Stefano Stabellini , Saravana Kannan , Joerg Roedel , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Christoph Hellwig , Bartosz Golaszewski , bskeggs@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Thierry Reding , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, matthew.auld@intel.com, linux-devicetree , Jianxiong Gao , Daniel Vetter , Will Deacon , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, airlied@linux.ie, Dan Williams , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, Rob Herring , rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, Bjorn Helgaas , Claire Chang , boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, Andy Shevchenko , jgross@suse.com, Nicolas Boichat , Greg KH , Randy Dunlap , lkml , Tomasz Figa , "list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" , Jim Quinlan , xypron.glpk@gmx.de, Robin Murphy , bauerman@linux.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 09:09:17AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > > swiotlb_init_with_tbl uses memblock_alloc to allocate the io_tlb_mem > > and memblock_alloc[1] will do memset in memblock_alloc_try_nid[2], so > > swiotlb_init_with_tbl is also good. > > I'm happy to add the memset in swiotlb_init_io_tlb_mem if you think > > it's clearer and safer. > > On x86, if the memset is done before set_memory_decrypted() and memory > encryption is active, then the memory will look like ciphertext afterwards > and not be zeroes. If zeroed memory is required, then a memset must be > done after the set_memory_decrypted() calls. Which should be fine - we don't care that the memory is cleared to 0, just that it doesn't leak other data. Maybe a comment would be useful, though,