From: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: <getelson@nvidia.com>, <matan@nvidia.com>, <rasland@nvidia.com>,
Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@nvidia.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] net/mlx5: add flow rule match for IPv4 IHL field
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 10:04:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210630070452.14055-3-getelson@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210630070452.14055-1-getelson@nvidia.com>
Provide flow rules capability to match on IPv4 IHL field.
Minimal HCA firmware version requiredto offload IPv4 IHL is
xx_30_2000.
Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
index c5d4b01e57..155f686ad1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
@@ -2451,19 +2451,19 @@ flow_dv_validate_item_gtp_psc(const struct rte_flow_item *item,
* 0 on success, a negative errno value otherwise and rte_errno is set.
*/
static int
-flow_dv_validate_item_ipv4(const struct rte_flow_item *item,
- uint64_t item_flags,
- uint64_t last_item,
- uint16_t ether_type,
- struct rte_flow_error *error)
+flow_dv_validate_item_ipv4(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
+ const struct rte_flow_item *item,
+ uint64_t item_flags, uint64_t last_item,
+ uint16_t ether_type, struct rte_flow_error *error)
{
int ret;
+ struct mlx5_priv *priv = dev->data->dev_private;
const struct rte_flow_item_ipv4 *spec = item->spec;
const struct rte_flow_item_ipv4 *last = item->last;
const struct rte_flow_item_ipv4 *mask = item->mask;
rte_be16_t fragment_offset_spec = 0;
rte_be16_t fragment_offset_last = 0;
- const struct rte_flow_item_ipv4 nic_ipv4_mask = {
+ struct rte_flow_item_ipv4 nic_ipv4_mask = {
.hdr = {
.src_addr = RTE_BE32(0xffffffff),
.dst_addr = RTE_BE32(0xffffffff),
@@ -2474,6 +2474,17 @@ flow_dv_validate_item_ipv4(const struct rte_flow_item *item,
},
};
+ if (mask && (mask->hdr.version_ihl & RTE_IPV4_HDR_IHL_MASK)) {
+ int tunnel = !!(item_flags & MLX5_FLOW_LAYER_TUNNEL);
+ bool ihl_cap = !tunnel ? priv->config.hca_attr.outer_ipv4_ihl :
+ priv->config.hca_attr.inner_ipv4_ihl;
+ if (!ihl_cap)
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
+ item,
+ "IPV4 ihl offload not supported");
+ nic_ipv4_mask.hdr.version_ihl = mask->hdr.version_ihl;
+ }
ret = mlx5_flow_validate_item_ipv4(item, item_flags, last_item,
ether_type, &nic_ipv4_mask,
MLX5_ITEM_RANGE_ACCEPTED, error);
@@ -6771,7 +6782,7 @@ flow_dv_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV4:
mlx5_flow_tunnel_ip_check(items, next_protocol,
&item_flags, &tunnel);
- ret = flow_dv_validate_item_ipv4(items, item_flags,
+ ret = flow_dv_validate_item_ipv4(dev, items, item_flags,
last_item, ether_type,
error);
if (ret < 0)
@@ -8154,7 +8165,7 @@ flow_dv_translate_item_ipv4(void *matcher, void *key,
void *headers_v;
char *l24_m;
char *l24_v;
- uint8_t tos;
+ uint8_t tos, ihl_m, ihl_v;
if (inner) {
headers_m = MLX5_ADDR_OF(fte_match_param, matcher,
@@ -8183,6 +8194,10 @@ flow_dv_translate_item_ipv4(void *matcher, void *key,
*(uint32_t *)l24_m = ipv4_m->hdr.src_addr;
*(uint32_t *)l24_v = ipv4_m->hdr.src_addr & ipv4_v->hdr.src_addr;
tos = ipv4_m->hdr.type_of_service & ipv4_v->hdr.type_of_service;
+ ihl_m = ipv4_m->hdr.version_ihl & RTE_IPV4_HDR_IHL_MASK;
+ ihl_v = ipv4_v->hdr.version_ihl & RTE_IPV4_HDR_IHL_MASK;
+ MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_lyr_2_4, headers_m, ipv4_ihl, ihl_m);
+ MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_lyr_2_4, headers_v, ipv4_ihl, ihl_m & ihl_v);
MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_lyr_2_4, headers_m, ip_ecn,
ipv4_m->hdr.type_of_service);
MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_lyr_2_4, headers_v, ip_ecn, tos);
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-30 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-30 7:04 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] net/mlx5: add flow rule match for IPv4 IHL field Gregory Etelson
2021-06-30 7:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] common/mlx5: query for hardware capability to offload " Gregory Etelson
2021-06-30 7:04 ` Gregory Etelson [this message]
2021-06-30 7:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app/testpmd: add flow item to match on IPv4 version_ihl field Gregory Etelson
2021-07-05 11:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] net/mlx5: add flow rule match for IPv4 IHL field Gregory Etelson
2021-07-05 11:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] common/mlx5: query for hardware capability to offload " Gregory Etelson
2021-07-05 11:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] net/mlx5: add flow rule match for " Gregory Etelson
2021-07-13 19:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] " Raslan Darawsheh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210630070452.14055-3-getelson@nvidia.com \
--to=getelson@nvidia.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
--cc=shahafs@nvidia.com \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.