All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brad Boyer <flar@allandria.com>
To: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	geert@linux-m68k.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] m68k: Improved switch stack handling
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 03:12:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210725101253.GA6096@allandria.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <db43bef1-7938-4fc1-853d-c20d66521329@gmail.com>

On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 07:44:11PM +1200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Am 25.07.2021 um 00:05 schrieb Andreas Schwab:
> >On Jul 24 2021, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> >
> >>According to my understanding, you can't get a F-line exception on
> >>68040.
> >
> >The F-line exception vector is used for all FPU illegal and
> >unimplemented insns.
> 
> Thanks - now from my reading of the fpsp040 code (which has mislead me in
> the past), it would seem that operations like sin() and exp() ought to raise
> that exception then. I don't see that in ARAnyM.

Yes, according to the 68040 user's manual, unimplemented and illegal F-line
instructions trigger the standard F-line exception vector (11) but have
separate stack frame formats so the fpsp040 code gets some extra data.
The CPU does a bunch of the prep work so that part doesn't need to be
emulated in software.

The ARAnyM docs appear to claim a strange combination that wouldn't
exist in hardware by implementing a full 68882 instead of the limited
subset found on a real 68040. Strangely, that might have been easier to
implement. However, it would also completely bypass any use of fpsp040.

	Brad Boyer
	flar@allandria.com


  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-25 10:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-23  0:21 [PATCH v4 0/3] m68k: Improved switch stack handling Michael Schmitz
2021-06-23  0:21 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] m68k: save extra registers on more syscall entry points Michael Schmitz
2021-06-23  0:21 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] m68k: correctly handle IO worker stack frame set-up Michael Schmitz
2021-06-23  0:21 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] m68k: track syscalls being traced with shallow user context stack Michael Schmitz
2021-07-25 10:05   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-07-25 20:48     ` Michael Schmitz
2021-07-25 21:00       ` Linus Torvalds
2021-07-26 14:27         ` Greg Ungerer
2021-07-15 13:29 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] m68k: Improved switch stack handling Eric W. Biederman
2021-07-15 23:10   ` Michael Schmitz
2021-07-17  5:38     ` Michael Schmitz
2021-07-17 18:52       ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-07-17 20:09         ` Michael Schmitz
2021-07-17 23:04           ` Michael Schmitz
2021-07-18 10:47             ` Andreas Schwab
2021-07-18 19:47               ` Michael Schmitz
2021-07-18 20:59                 ` Brad Boyer
2021-07-19  3:15                   ` Michael Schmitz
2021-07-20 20:32             ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-07-20 22:16               ` Michael Schmitz
2021-07-22 14:49                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-07-23  4:23                   ` Michael Schmitz
2021-07-23 22:31                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-07-23 23:52                       ` Michael Schmitz
2021-07-24 12:05                         ` Andreas Schwab
2021-07-25  7:44                           ` Michael Schmitz
2021-07-25 10:12                             ` Brad Boyer [this message]
2021-07-26  2:00                               ` Michael Schmitz
2021-07-26 19:36                                 ` [RFC][PATCH] signal/m68k: Use force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV) in fpsp040_die Eric W. Biederman
2021-07-26 20:13                                   ` Andreas Schwab
2021-07-26 20:29                                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-07-26 21:25                                       ` Andreas Schwab
2021-07-26 20:29                                   ` Michael Schmitz
2021-07-26 21:08                                     ` [PATCH] " Eric W. Biederman
2021-08-25 15:56                                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-08-26 12:15                                       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-07-25 11:53                             ` [PATCH v4 0/3] m68k: Improved switch stack handling Andreas Schwab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210725101253.GA6096@allandria.com \
    --to=flar@allandria.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=schmitzmic@gmail.com \
    --cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.