From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/9] sk_buff: optimize layout for GRO
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 18:25:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210725162528.GK9904@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhSsNWSus4xr7erxQs_4GyfJYb7_6a8juisWue6Xc4fVkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:
> > There is the skb extension infra, does that work for you?
>
> I was hopeful that when the skb_ext capability was introduced we might
> be able to use it for the LSM(s), but when I asked netdev if they
> would be willing to accept patches to leverage the skb_ext
> infrastructure I was told "no".
I found
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAHC9VhSz1_KA1tCJtNjwK26BOkGhKGbPT7v1O82mWPduvWwd4A@mail.gmail.com/#r
and from what I gather from your comments and that of Casey
I think skb extensions is the correct thing for this (i.e., needs
netlabel/secid config/enablement so typically won't be active on
a distro kernel by default).
It certainly makes more sense to me than doing lookups
in a hashtable based on a ID (I tried to do that to get rid of skb->nf_bridge
pointer years ago and it I could not figure out how to invalidate an entry
without adding a new skb destructor callback).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-25 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-21 16:44 [PATCH RFC 0/9] sk_buff: optimize layout for GRO Paolo Abeni
2021-07-21 18:15 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 7:10 ` Paolo Abeni
2021-07-22 16:04 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 16:57 ` Paolo Abeni
2021-07-22 18:41 ` Paul Moore
2021-07-24 18:51 ` Florian Westphal
2021-07-25 14:57 ` Paul Moore
2021-07-25 16:25 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2021-07-25 21:53 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-25 22:52 ` Florian Westphal
2021-07-26 15:13 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-07-27 2:51 ` Paul Moore
2021-07-28 16:21 ` Paolo Abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210725162528.GK9904@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.