From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C9AC4320A for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 22:56:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2783160F02 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 22:56:31 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 2783160F02 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=konsulko.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.denx.de Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899D182D73; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:56:29 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=konsulko.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=konsulko.com header.i=@konsulko.com header.b="DlMVtxvo"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id D3F8F82D82; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:56:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qt1-x833.google.com (mail-qt1-x833.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::833]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4B6582C88 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:56:24 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=konsulko.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=trini@konsulko.com Received: by mail-qt1-x833.google.com with SMTP id d2so2601613qto.6 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:56:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=konsulko.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ISEhSDjY7qil62SdsbdnTaJw/8L0suXNYUZ8Ck7wsiQ=; b=DlMVtxvowANdYi6iRTyyx7s8tELYVrRmPg+90z3Voj2Di1F5VMEWtLPaH9Y6q1PN3A Wt2CS9IVVUBwJoXfzyNH45fRonHRDA2+r634mdkQs9peFiR+FOwI0IOwxRkAjL4Z4xWU PYv1UWDeY7dLMmRlMkzmasAnJ7ReyORsnhpkY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ISEhSDjY7qil62SdsbdnTaJw/8L0suXNYUZ8Ck7wsiQ=; b=nUu64JF5qINz53Jq30YhEoH4XbfrnQfVm/47P/7kGvEYjBn8MY+buqXY4Y6Ss86ndz E8W7PDb96EalqsHlDS93aOUacCYrdiWRlYHmbnZ+svv4/gkAx8HUGtLPUM2U0Y8NHNLI u3x8d/niuSUAoltDFodYt6eUVkJXNYM2CsvtOLSlTcJ3QbmEI5sdbg+HPkxJQecg/Ih0 ep2YM3JigePvMa88EpBoVnMj6NfEMYWPcZwv93yPdtZdyFCWWGMrHe5a/I369eadHNw6 +vCoCo0TuG0mj7cm6n7v3AEgHcwxxTDbwmXSV2sE3gbkXzp+TVixu9rxwy9eZZjsGvlT +EZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530HCMin9reLrA3STDfR7mHH//aHACROwDfrDnKdVgCxcczYNXXi U77k76ohcr9ZL/UMN+QGh96RjA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzeFpdyWGKiI3dHbORUlMBjH8T5yMWmecLcw0bAPozxnXy8DR5tfUn6kR9rZ2rAEAr6nu0JFw== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4cce:: with SMTP id l14mr1719483qtv.219.1627512983456; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:56:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bill-the-cat (2603-6081-7b01-cbda-3037-3a3d-435c-0707.res6.spectrum.com. [2603:6081:7b01:cbda:3037:3a3d:435c:707]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u4sm749507qkb.99.2021.07.28.15.56.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:56:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 18:56:19 -0400 From: Tom Rini To: Artem Panfilov Cc: "Alex G." , "u-boot@lists.denx.de" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] lib/ecdsa: Fix LibreSSL before v2.7.0 Message-ID: <20210728225619.GB9379@bill-the-cat> References: <20210728181023.25067-1-panfilov.artyom@gmail.com> <21fa035a-7ab5-7045-dd47-90670eb8be14@gmail.com> <20210728200701.GY9379@bill-the-cat> <34cdf0ed-c97d-e5ec-31ff-24e4ca085c4d@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Oe/ScElO4SkQHdx9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <34cdf0ed-c97d-e5ec-31ff-24e4ca085c4d@gmail.com> X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.2 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean --Oe/ScElO4SkQHdx9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 01:29:35AM +0300, Artem Panfilov wrote: >=20 > On 28.07.2021 23:07, Tom Rini wrote: > > There is a fine line at least that I'm willing to walk in terms of > > supporting ancient OSes directly and also not making things overly > > complicated in our own tree. That said, openssl tends to be one of the > > ones where it does get hard to support old versions. LibreSSL 2.7.5 was > > released December 15th, 2018 and is the end of the 2.7.x line it seems. > > > > I'm interested to hear what the case is where the right call is the say > > you're building modern software for real world use against such old > > libraries. > Hi Tom, > I have a specific test case where I test if it's still possible to > build upstream master u-boot on our infrastructure (progression testing). > I also test runtime on our boards. >=20 > I understand that nowadays everyone uses docker container, > but =E2=80=8Bwe have limited docker nodes right now on our site. >=20 > If you don't want to support OpenSSL < 1.1.0 and do not test it, > then I suggest dropping it all over the tree because it doesn't > make sense and looks misleading with such a partial solution. Part of the question is then, were you enabling the SSL-related parts before this change? Or did the way the code is now being enabled/disabled trigger this now being enabled when it wasn't before? --=20 Tom --Oe/ScElO4SkQHdx9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGzBAABCgAdFiEEGjx/cOCPqxcHgJu/FHw5/5Y0tywFAmEB4JAACgkQFHw5/5Y0 tyxAPAv9GPat6aYoHAviKLL8PniYz5vNqqw3VM6149o8jTsXJDhteu5G9nKXViZw NANT1ncl8nCpdk+XFr6kDAd/FXUqSrjtDxywXOiSRd3Mn/FLy+KaB1IEug3/8lpS V+EUNsdcQUZqOiZZBjwVGhwhFB/2gpzZuDD4vZq4i+rs7MI9wACaDGswb9OsahNm BtUs/Nxp3cIpcRBN6f8fRN7hn+4lIkztAtgVxZF5FjQ0xD9UXTJ3ECzRKn/HlWs1 xkyFZ+q7FGw5atHKXuXWdO+YZYV1IjhHPg+42R5tyHeWOfH/APLbsdv46NHS/kZ/ PjSMfoofomfKsdz7eu6MOco8nktLP+wHv0CLxAU3bpcmoQwwy3x3+lGroDCpTRJ6 ntua7aiGRgoUDWgorOt0y6/IyI9XY0Jbyi8Iqa+TPdfUL1IPBHbQFhxCBz5p2eto f0k+Em+eM148WSpQFP03NwWWmyNkrc3Ed9HcMxWcaelJw5yFqvu6LlRSGwmCW8d2 //XilVQO =qPYu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Oe/ScElO4SkQHdx9--