From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 13:07:09 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] Add virtio Admin Virtqueue specification Message-ID: <20210802130602-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20210726165254.8529-1-mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> <20210728083306-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <6de5eb17-1d0d-45d5-b1fa-e21989341b4f@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6de5eb17-1d0d-45d5-b1fa-e21989341b4f@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline To: Jason Wang Cc: Max Gurtovoy , virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org, cohuck@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, oren@nvidia.com, parav@nvidia.com, shahafs@nvidia.com, eperezma@redhat.com, aadam@redhat.com, bodong@nvidia.com, amikheev@nvidia.com List-ID: On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 10:25:33AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Yes, so I think it makes sense to make the admin virtqueue as a transport > and then build other stuffs on top. As an alternative to pci/mmio etc? We'd need to better define what we are trying to achieve here ... -- MST